-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 92
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Using Array<Type> should generate link to Type #211
Comments
It says that it's suggested to use this notation for type templates be it array or any other case or meta-magic. Parsing that even for very basic cases like arrays was never supported. |
Why is this closed? Are you saying that this can not possibly be implemented? This would be a very useful feature. |
👍 |
I'm saying that this isn't a bug nor it is a feature that I'm going to implement on my own because of lack of the time. You are welcome to implement PR that I will gladly accept. |
Reopen this issue and add a |
The doc says that an
Array<Type>
notation is supported for@return
(and others). In my experience, this does not generate a link to the documentation page forType
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: