Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 2, 2021. It is now read-only.

Showing back pressure for masked FED #33

Open
mommsen opened this issue Oct 21, 2017 · 3 comments
Open

Showing back pressure for masked FED #33

mommsen opened this issue Oct 21, 2017 · 3 comments

Comments

@mommsen
Copy link

mommsen commented Oct 21, 2017

Hi,

in the current run 305366 DAQView shows 12.6% back pressure on FED 583:
http://daq-expert.cms/daq2view-react/index.html?setup=cdaq&time=2017-10-21-13:58:55

However, this FED is masked. The snapshot is reflecting this correctly:

{
"@id" : "FED_588",
"id" : 588,
"frlIO" : 0,
"fmmIO" : 5,
"srcIdExpected" : 583,
"srcIdReceived" : 583,
"percentBackpressure" : 12.6,
"frl_AccBIFIBackpressureSeconds" : 0.0,
"percentWarning" : 0.0,
"percentBusy" : 0.0,
"ttsState" : "R_8",
"numSCRCerrors" : 0,
"numFCRCerrors" : 0,
"numTriggers" : 0,
"eventCounter" : 0,
"fmmMasked" : true,
"frlMasked" : true,
"hasSLINK" : true,
"hasTTS" : true,
"ruFedInError" : false,
"ruFedBXError" : 0,
"ruFedCRCError" : 0,
"ruFedDataCorruption" : 0,
"ruFedOutOfSync" : 0,
"ruFedWithoutFragments" : false,
"frl_AccSlinkFullSec" : 0.0,
"frl_AccLatchedFerol40ClockSeconds" : 15522.04959564,
"ru" : "RU_ru-c2e14-10-01",
"ref_frl" : "FRL_7$frlpc-s2d10-21-01",
"ref_fmm" : "FMM_45",
"ref_ttcp" : "TTCP_TOTDET",
"ref_dependentFeds" : [ ]
}

Why do we have "back pressure" on this FED while it is masked?

Remi

@Phil2812
Copy link
Collaborator

Phil2812 commented Nov 1, 2017

As it is, the backpressure, unexpected source id, fed and slink crc errors are displayed either way. Only the FED id and the TTS state display are affected by a fed being masked.

If this is not intentional, please tell me which information is supposed to be displayed (if any) when the FED is masked.

@mommsen
Copy link
Author

mommsen commented Nov 1, 2017

All this information is most likely stale when the FED is masked. Thus, I would suggest to not display any of it.

Remi

@Phil2812
Copy link
Collaborator

Phil2812 commented Nov 1, 2017

Display conditions fixed in cd79eaf; leaving issue open due to relation to open aggregator issue.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants