You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, your project geonames-reconcile requires "fuzzywuzzy==0.18.0" in its dependency. After analyzing the source code, we found that the following versions of fuzzywuzzy can also be suitable without affecting your project, i.e., fuzzywuzzy 0.17.0. Therefore, we suggest to loosen the dependency on fuzzywuzzy from "fuzzywuzzy==0.18.0" to "fuzzywuzzy>=0.17.0,<=0.18.0" to avoid any possible conflict for importing more packages or for downstream projects that may use geonames-reconcile.
May I pull a request to further loosen the dependency on fuzzywuzzy?
By the way, could you please tell us whether such dependency analysis may be potentially helpful for maintaining dependencies easier during your development?
We also give our detailed analysis as follows for your reference:
Your project geonames-reconcile directly uses 1 APIs from package fuzzywuzzy.
fuzzywuzzy.fuzz.token_sort_ratio
Beginning from the 1 APIs above, 19 functions are then indirectly called, including 15 fuzzywuzzy's internal APIs and 4 outsider APIs. The specific call graph is listed as follows (neglecting some repeated function occurrences).
We scan fuzzywuzzy's versions and observe that during its evolution between any version from [0.17.0] and 0.18.0, the changing functions (diffs being listed below) have none intersection with any function or API we mentioned above (either directly or indirectly called by this project).
As for other packages, the APIs of difflib and warnings are called by fuzzywuzzy in the call graph and the dependencies on these packages also stay the same in our suggested versions, thus avoiding any outside conflict.
Therefore, we believe that it is quite safe to loose your dependency on fuzzywuzzy from "fuzzywuzzy==0.18.0" to "fuzzywuzzy>=0.17.0,<=0.18.0". This will improve the applicability of geonames-reconcile and reduce the possibility of any further dependency conflict with other projects.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi, your project geonames-reconcile requires "fuzzywuzzy==0.18.0" in its dependency. After analyzing the source code, we found that the following versions of fuzzywuzzy can also be suitable without affecting your project, i.e., fuzzywuzzy 0.17.0. Therefore, we suggest to loosen the dependency on fuzzywuzzy from "fuzzywuzzy==0.18.0" to "fuzzywuzzy>=0.17.0,<=0.18.0" to avoid any possible conflict for importing more packages or for downstream projects that may use geonames-reconcile.
May I pull a request to further loosen the dependency on fuzzywuzzy?
By the way, could you please tell us whether such dependency analysis may be potentially helpful for maintaining dependencies easier during your development?
We also give our detailed analysis as follows for your reference:
Your project geonames-reconcile directly uses 1 APIs from package fuzzywuzzy.
Beginning from the 1 APIs above, 19 functions are then indirectly called, including 15 fuzzywuzzy's internal APIs and 4 outsider APIs. The specific call graph is listed as follows (neglecting some repeated function occurrences).
We scan fuzzywuzzy's versions and observe that during its evolution between any version from [0.17.0] and 0.18.0, the changing functions (diffs being listed below) have none intersection with any function or API we mentioned above (either directly or indirectly called by this project).
As for other packages, the APIs of difflib and warnings are called by fuzzywuzzy in the call graph and the dependencies on these packages also stay the same in our suggested versions, thus avoiding any outside conflict.
Therefore, we believe that it is quite safe to loose your dependency on fuzzywuzzy from "fuzzywuzzy==0.18.0" to "fuzzywuzzy>=0.17.0,<=0.18.0". This will improve the applicability of geonames-reconcile and reduce the possibility of any further dependency conflict with other projects.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: