Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

"LGBT (excluding pornography)" #314

Open
ecawthon opened this issue Mar 8, 2018 · 2 comments
Open

"LGBT (excluding pornography)" #314

ecawthon opened this issue Mar 8, 2018 · 2 comments

Comments

@ecawthon
Copy link

ecawthon commented Mar 8, 2018

There are several different category codes (other than PORN) that could arguably include pornography, notably

Provocative Attire,PROV,PROV,"Websites which show provocative attire and portray women in a sexual manner, wearing minimal clothing. "
Sex Education,XED,XED,"Includes contraception, abstinence, STDs, healthy sexuality, teen pregnancy, rape prevention, abortion, sexual rights, and sexual health services."
Online Dating,DATE,DATE,"Online dating services which can be used to meet people, post profiles, chat, etc"
Media sharing,MMED,MMED,"Video, audio or photo sharing platforms."

The LGBT category, however, is alone in having a description that specifies that it excludes pornography:

LGBT,LGBT,GAYL,A range of gay-lesbian-bisexual-transgender queer issues. (Excluding pornography)

This seems inconsistent. I propose that either "Excluding pornography" be added to the descriptions of PROV, XED, DATE, and MMED, or that it be removed from the description of LGBT.

@hellais
Copy link
Collaborator

hellais commented Feb 21, 2020

Yes this is a very good point, thanks for suggesting it and raising it.

In order for this to be done, though we need to reprocess all the test list updating the description in each file to include this updated description.

I am thinking that perhaps this is a good opportunity to also take care of the issue of #582.

@mhombach
Copy link
Contributor

mhombach commented Aug 4, 2021

@hellais Since 1.5 years have passed, what is the status of this issue? :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants
@hellais @ecawthon @mhombach and others