Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Section 5.6: CIM Model Manager concensus is needed on how Containment is explicitely stated as being represented. #32

Open
tviegut opened this issue Oct 31, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
cim mm consensus needed CIM Model Manager consensus needed documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Comments

@tviegut
Copy link
Contributor

tviegut commented Oct 31, 2023

In reference to the following paragraph in the introduction:

No other options should be used, although some association ends in CIM are defined as aggregation (= shared).

Tanja Kostic commented:

If there is something other than “vanilla” association to be used, then it should be composition (black diamond), that denotes containment, not the white diamond (that is very controversial altogether in the UML community).

Decision is needed on if we explicitly outline in the modeling guide what Tanja is raising here.

@tviegut tviegut added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation cim mm consensus needed CIM Model Manager consensus needed labels Oct 31, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cim mm consensus needed CIM Model Manager consensus needed documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant