You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This is a general question rather than an actual issue.
I'm doing umbrella sampling on a variety of systems, and with a variety of collective variables. I make sure that the individual trajectories in the umbrellas are long enough, are equilibrated, and are decorrelated. I verify that this is the case by subsampling different portions of the trajectories, and verifying that the final free energies do not change.
However, I noticed that I was largely exaggerating the number of umbrellas, to the point where neighboring umbrellas were to a large extent overlapping with each other and with many other umbrellas -- see added screenshot for a simple histogram plot.
When removing a fraction of the umbrellas and re-evaluating MBAR, I did notice a significant change in the relative free energies.
Is this intrinsic to the system of equations that needs to be solved in MBAR (for example, that overlap of a given distribution with a large number of other distributions makes it intrinsically ill-conditioned, or small energy differences between hamiltonians of the different states as is the case when centering umbrellas close to each other)? I'm using the robust solver protocol, and JAX is running in 64-bit mode. He does not give me any warnings about the numerical accuracy.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
svandenhaute
changed the title
[Q] intrinsic difficulty when solving MBAR for large numbers of similar thermodynamic states
[Q] intrinsic difficulty when solving MBAR for large number of similar thermodynamic states
Feb 12, 2024
This is a general question rather than an actual issue.
I'm doing umbrella sampling on a variety of systems, and with a variety of collective variables. I make sure that the individual trajectories in the umbrellas are long enough, are equilibrated, and are decorrelated. I verify that this is the case by subsampling different portions of the trajectories, and verifying that the final free energies do not change.
However, I noticed that I was largely exaggerating the number of umbrellas, to the point where neighboring umbrellas were to a large extent overlapping with each other and with many other umbrellas -- see added screenshot for a simple histogram plot.
When removing a fraction of the umbrellas and re-evaluating MBAR, I did notice a significant change in the relative free energies.
Is this intrinsic to the system of equations that needs to be solved in MBAR (for example, that overlap of a given distribution with a large number of other distributions makes it intrinsically ill-conditioned, or small energy differences between hamiltonians of the different states as is the case when centering umbrellas close to each other)? I'm using the robust solver protocol, and JAX is running in 64-bit mode. He does not give me any warnings about the numerical accuracy.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: