You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Why do we have a multibit wide synchronizer with no handshake mechanism? You can't reliably synchronize a multibit bus unless it's grey-coded.
A single bit synchronizer must be of configurable depth and/or readily replaceable by integrator specific synchronizers.
2-bit depth synchronizers may not comply with integrator/foundry design rules or practice.
Recommendation: Add define for synchronizer depth and/or define for ready replacement of the synchronizers by the integrator.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
these were meant to "bungle" independent wires to reduce code typing . they are instantiating dual flop synchronizer modules, which can be replaced by a physical library cell.
re: module rvsyncss, module rvsyncss_fpga
"lib/beh_lib.sv"
Why do we have a multibit wide synchronizer with no handshake mechanism? You can't reliably synchronize a multibit bus unless it's grey-coded.
A single bit synchronizer must be of configurable depth and/or readily replaceable by integrator specific synchronizers.
2-bit depth synchronizers may not comply with integrator/foundry design rules or practice.
Recommendation: Add define for synchronizer depth and/or define for ready replacement of the synchronizers by the integrator.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: