Replies: 6 comments
-
peakshift/bitcoin-ux#20 (comment) outlines this exact issue in this medium post with Boltz |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Though not exactly change, lightning channels for newbs can benefit from turbo channels to receive right away It's a 0-conf channel |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
if using default off-chain mechanism non-interactive channel
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Routing payments can be outsourced to a service provider without giving up privacy by using trampoline payments |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Adding some notes from a call yesterday to this thread NotesWhat is Chaincase?
Note: Chaincase prioritizes sovereignity, and privacy + non-custodial are how it achieves this Open questions Dan wants to explore:
Current infrastructureChaincase infrastructure details (some random notes, Dan can expand/clarify):
Chaumian coinjoin
Implementing Lightning non-custodiallyServices/implementations to explore:
> Where does the distinction fall between the custom/non-custodial parts of the above options? > What does lnd need to do on the client, and what can a service provider do? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Lightning Labs recommended a zap-like implementation with lnurl connection to a full node. Then, they suggested we iterate to a full lnd process hooked up to neutrino or our own block filters.
@johnsBeharry pointed me towards @MaxHillebrand 's tweet on spending change with the @BoltzExchange service.
Instead of sitting on that change output what if it went right to Boltz or opened a channel otherwise?
I'm sure it would be a can of worms to implement anything beyond an API call so we must discuss the tradeoffs.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions