Dear @Dave-Allured

Thanks for raising this issue. It is relevant to #528 and discussion 323, so I've flagged it in both. Since the proposal to add this sentence was accepted as an enhancement, with the required amount of support being expressed, I don't think we can reverse that decision as a defect i.e. if no-one objects. I think we need support for your proposal to remove the sentence as a new enhancement, so I'll change the label.

Best wishes

Jonathan

@JonathanGregory, thanks for switching the label. That is fine with me.

I supported inclusion of the text now suggested to be removed. The anticipated main use case that was to create a mechanism for adding localization language tags to attribute names. But as the conversation over in that issue has moved forward in a different issue see here and subsequent comments.

Hence I support this proposal to remove the sentence rather than trying to improve it. This has the advantage variable names and attribute names will use the same character set.

I too support this proposal, for the same reasons as Lars. This issue has sufficient support to be accepted in three weeks, on 30th November, if no-one raises concerns by then.