Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

About Evaluation Metrics #35

Open
Myzhao1999 opened this issue Jul 9, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

About Evaluation Metrics #35

Myzhao1999 opened this issue Jul 9, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@Myzhao1999
Copy link

Hi~
Thanks for your interesting work and the open code.
I noticed that you mentioned using max-F1-pixel and max-F1 region as Evaluation Metrics in the paper. Would you please tell me if you have tried to use image-level AUC and pxiel-level AUC to evaluate this work like the previous work?

@caoyunkang
Copy link
Owner

Thanks for your question! SAA+ is not good at AUROCs. Intuitively, higher AUROCs require continuous anomaly scores, but the scores produced by SAA+ are typically small or large, which makes SAA+ weak in AUROCs. In contrast, max-F1 can better reflect the binary segmentation performance, which can better show SAA+' superiority.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants