Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

does kubeflow-profiles operator properly handle configuring ports for the workloads? #115

Open
ca-scribner opened this issue May 15, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@ca-scribner
Copy link
Contributor

the charm exposes config for port and management-port but these are only used to configure the KubernetesServicePatch. I think these are meant to represent the ports that the kubeflow-profiles and kfam containers expose - when would a user need to adjust these with juju config? For example, how can I make juju deploy kubeflow-profiles --config port=8888 work with this charm?

What I think is missing here is telling the underlying workload containers to actually use these ports. As is, it looks like these port configs change how the data is routed, but do not make sure something is listening at the new place.

@ca-scribner ca-scribner added the bug Something isn't working label May 15, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant