Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update images used for testing an airgapped CKF 1.9 deployment #1051

Closed
mvlassis opened this issue Sep 4, 2024 · 3 comments · Fixed by #1053
Closed

Update images used for testing an airgapped CKF 1.9 deployment #1051

mvlassis opened this issue Sep 4, 2024 · 3 comments · Fixed by #1053
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@mvlassis
Copy link
Contributor

mvlassis commented Sep 4, 2024

Context

The images are manually retrieved in scripts/airgapped/get-all-images.sh, and specifically in these lines. They should be updated for CKF 1.9.

What needs to get done

  • Look at the each of the images retrieved manually in get-all-images.sh
  • Investigate whether they should be updated for the new version of Kubeflow, and update if necessary

Definition of Done

The get-all-images.sh script successfully retrieves updated images for testing the airgapped CKF 1.9 deployment.

@mvlassis mvlassis added the enhancement New feature or request label Sep 4, 2024
Copy link

Thank you for reporting us your feedback!

The internal ticket has been created: https://warthogs.atlassian.net/browse/KF-6200.

This message was autogenerated

@kimwnasptd
Copy link
Contributor

@mvlassis small note, could you also update the different places in READMEs to include 1.9?

We discussed with @NohaIhab also as part of my refactoring PR of the image gathering script
#1038 (comment)

@kimwnasptd
Copy link
Contributor

Also, the file structure for how the script is going to get dynamic images will change as part of #1038 (comment)

So the next step to track in this issue will be where to put the files for the 1.9 release, by mirroring what we'll do for 1.8 as part of #1038

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants