-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Scenarios should be grouped by feature #73
Comments
Currently, each Except: as of gherkin 6 there is a new concept: Rule which brings one more layer of depth. While it seems doable, what benefit would it have? In the final output, each scenario should be a One more case, would be, that there always is only one |
Pros:
|
Currently, it seems for me it there are 2 possible ways regarding
Dunno. In either case, it isn't neither a primary concern, nor one that somehow drastically would change how lib interacts with end user (developer). |
@revati if you have multiple |
I'm more inclined towards seconds option, as it would provide better integration with Is it possible to create some sort of poll in github? 😅 |
No other way than "emoji voting". |
Cucumber doesn't even support multiple features in a single file: I don't think that should be something to worry about. Either the things in the single file being tested are so closely related that they are part of the same feature, or they are separate enough that they deserve their own feature files. This seems to be the philosophy they are following. |
Feature
should be translated todescribe
andScenario
totest
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: