Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

"pack builder create" runs out of memory when using pack 0.30 #1886

Closed
mmtevelde opened this issue Sep 5, 2023 · 3 comments · Fixed by #1887
Closed

"pack builder create" runs out of memory when using pack 0.30 #1886

mmtevelde opened this issue Sep 5, 2023 · 3 comments · Fixed by #1887
Assignees
Labels
status/ready Issue ready to be worked on. type/bug Issue that reports an unexpected behaviour.

Comments

@mmtevelde
Copy link

Summary

We are running a pack builder create in our CICD pipeline on runners that have 7GB of memory available. One of the buildpacks included in the builder is 4GB in size (because of GPU drivers necessary to be in there). Up until pack 0.29, this was working fine.

However, when testing the upgrade to pack 0.30, the pack builder create command fails with exit code 137. The last logs that are written:

Creating builder with the following buildpacks:
-> <all expected buildpacks are listed>

The process crashes approximately 30 seconds after this.

When we run the same process locally we initially didn't encounter any problems with pack 0.30, it seems to work fine given that enough memory is available. As a rough guess, I would say the process fails once the size of the buildpacks exceeds the available memory divided by 2.


Reproduction

Steps

I have reproduced the issue as follows:

  • Create colima instance with limited amount of memory (2GB)
  • If necessary, download the Linux distribution of both pack 0.29 and pack 0.30 so that it's available inside Colima
  • Clone the buildpacks sample repo as described here https://buildpacks.io/docs/operator-guide/create-a-builder/
  • Add a new buildpack in this repo:
    Create directory: mkdir buildpacks/memory-test
    Define include-files: vi buildpacks/memory-test/buildpack.toml
api = "0.7"

[buildpack]
  id = "memory-test"
  version = "0.0.1"
[metadata]
  include-files = [
    "testfile"]

[[stacks]]
  id = "*"

Create sample large file: dd if=/dev/zero of=buildpacks/memory-test/testfile bs=1G count=1

Then running the following command works fine using pack 0.29:
pack builder create my-builder:jammy --config ./builder.toml

jammy: Pulling from cnbs/sample-stack-run
Digest: sha256:e0a2065681ca908be7d612e71eed30963ccd6560f210798f3939cbc8a58daefe
Status: Image is up to date for cnbs/sample-stack-run:jammy
jammy: Pulling from cnbs/sample-stack-build
Digest: sha256:2f7566720a7c32a0ef574415952573fb2b203af740802ab09c6e9fac455f6763
Status: Image is up to date for cnbs/sample-stack-build:jammy
Successfully created builder image my-builder:jammy
Tip: Run pack build <image-name> --builder my-builder:jammy to use this builder

But using pack 0.30 it fails:

jammy: Pulling from cnbs/sample-stack-run
Digest: sha256:e0a2065681ca908be7d612e71eed30963ccd6560f210798f3939cbc8a58daefe
Status: Image is up to date for cnbs/sample-stack-run:jammy
jammy: Pulling from cnbs/sample-stack-build
Digest: sha256:2f7566720a7c32a0ef574415952573fb2b203af740802ab09c6e9fac455f6763
Status: Image is up to date for cnbs/sample-stack-build:jammy
Killed

echo $? returns 137

Current behavior

Pack exits with an error while running pack builder create

Expected behavior

Builder creation succeeds as before


Environment

Microsoft-hosted agent for Azure, Colima

pack info

From Colima:

Pack:
  Version:  0.30.0+git-c38f7da.build-4952
  OS/Arch:  linux/amd64

Default Lifecycle Version:  0.17.0

Supported Platform APIs:  0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9, 0.10, 0.11, 0.12

Config:
(no config file found at /home/lima.linux/.pack/config.toml)
docker info

From Colima:

Client:
 Context:    default
 Debug Mode: false
 Plugins:
  buildx: Docker Buildx (Docker Inc.)
    Version:  v0.10.4
    Path:     /usr/libexec/docker/cli-plugins/docker-buildx

Server:
 Containers: 0
  Running: 0
  Paused: 0
  Stopped: 0
 Images: 82
 Server Version: 23.0.6
 Storage Driver: overlay2
  Backing Filesystem: extfs
  Supports d_type: true
  Using metacopy: false
  Native Overlay Diff: true
  userxattr: false
 Logging Driver: json-file
 Cgroup Driver: cgroupfs
 Cgroup Version: 1
 Plugins:
  Volume: local
  Network: bridge host ipvlan macvlan null overlay
  Log: awslogs fluentd gcplogs gelf journald json-file local logentries splunk syslog
 Swarm: inactive
 Runtimes: io.containerd.runc.v2 runc
 Default Runtime: runc
 Init Binary: docker-init
 containerd version: 1fbd70374134b891f97ce19c70b6e50c7b9f4e0d
 runc version: 860f061b76bb4fc671f0f9e900f7d80ff93d4eb7
 init version: 
 Security Options:
  seccomp
   Profile: builtin
 Kernel Version: 6.1.29-0-virt
 Operating System: Alpine Linux v3.18
 OSType: linux
 Architecture: aarch64
 CPUs: 8
 Total Memory: 1.931GiB
 Name: colima-buildpacks
 ID: 14f22e71-627a-4e28-a9ca-44fe127d4dda
 Docker Root Dir: /var/lib/docker
 Debug Mode: false
 Registry: https://index.docker.io/v1/
 Experimental: false
 Insecure Registries:
  quay.io
  127.0.0.0/8
 Live Restore Enabled: false
@mmtevelde mmtevelde added status/triage Issue or PR that requires contributor attention. type/bug Issue that reports an unexpected behaviour. labels Sep 5, 2023
@jjbustamante jjbustamante added status/ready Issue ready to be worked on. and removed status/triage Issue or PR that requires contributor attention. labels Sep 5, 2023
@jjbustamante
Copy link
Member

I think this bug was generated by the changes made to the builder creation to support the flatten stuff. In pack 0.29 we parallelize the buildpacks processing but, by mistake I removed it. I think the PR 1170 from @edithwuly could be helpful.

note We are planning to simplify the flatten feature and most the code added for pack 0.30.0 will be removed, so I am not sure if it is better to fix this issue in this version or just wait for solving #1880

@jjbustamante jjbustamante self-assigned this Sep 5, 2023
@jjbustamante
Copy link
Member

I was able to reproduce the error with the steps provided by @bruthphorce (but using a 4GB file). I ran a container with a memory limit to simulate the environment.

docker run -v /var/run/docker.sock:/var/run/docker.sock -v ./:/home/root  -it --memory="2g" --memory-reservation="1g" ubuntu /bin/bash

Once inside the container, I ran the pack builder create command setting the environment variable GODEBUG=gctrace=1 the ouput was similar to this one:

Creating builder with the following buildpacks:
-> samples/[email protected]
-> samples/[email protected]
-> samples/[email protected]
-> [email protected]
-> samples/[email protected]
-> samples/[email protected]
-> samples/[email protected]
gc 7 @13.557s 0%: 0.055+4.7+0.076 ms clock, 0.44+0/4.6/14+0.60 ms cpu, 5->6->3 MB, 5 MB goal, 0 MB stacks, 0 MB globals, 8 P
gc 8 @13.570s 0%: 0.070+8.2+0.003 ms clock, 0.56+0/8.3/1.1+0.025 ms cpu, 7->7->3 MB, 7 MB goal, 0 MB stacks, 0 MB globals, 8 P
gc 9 @13.590s 0%: 0.066+9.5+0.092 ms clock, 0.52+0/10/0.85+0.74 ms cpu, 9->9->4 MB, 9 MB goal, 0 MB stacks, 0 MB globals, 8 P
gc 10 @13.615s 0%: 0.059+5.2+0.33 ms clock, 0.47+0.22/2.6/0.59+2.7 ms cpu, 9->9->3 MB, 9 MB goal, 0 MB stacks, 0 MB globals, 8 P
gc 11 @13.631s 0%: 0.046+12+0.074 ms clock, 0.37+0.066/1.7/0.75+0.59 ms cpu, 6->9->6 MB, 7 MB goal, 0 MB stacks, 0 MB globals, 8 P
gc 12 @13.667s 0%: 0.099+13+0.12 ms clock, 0.79+0/13/0.77+1.0 ms cpu, 15->15->5 MB, 15 MB goal, 0 MB stacks, 0 MB globals, 8 P
gc 13 @13.695s 0%: 0.041+12+0.14 ms clock, 0.33+0/12/0.76+1.1 ms cpu, 15->15->7 MB, 15 MB goal, 0 MB stacks, 0 MB globals, 8 P
gc 14 @13.716s 0%: 0.038+36+0.096 ms clock, 0.30+0/37/0.95+0.77 ms cpu, 14->14->9 MB, 16 MB goal, 0 MB stacks, 0 MB globals, 8 P
gc 15 @13.775s 0%: 0.048+6.8+0.10 ms clock, 0.38+0/7.1/0.34+0.87 ms cpu, 27->27->12 MB, 27 MB goal, 0 MB stacks, 0 MB globals, 8 P
gc 16 @13.797s 0%: 0.042+12+0.096 ms clock, 0.33+0/12/0.94+0.77 ms cpu, 25->25->15 MB, 25 MB goal, 0 MB stacks, 0 MB globals, 8 P
gc 17 @13.826s 0%: 0.070+25+0.082 ms clock, 0.56+0/25/0.79+0.65 ms cpu, 31->31->18 MB, 31 MB goal, 0 MB stacks, 0 MB globals, 8 P
gc 18 @13.872s 0%: 0.045+24+0.069 ms clock, 0.36+0/25/1.3+0.55 ms cpu, 38->38->22 MB, 38 MB goal, 0 MB stacks, 0 MB globals, 8 P
gc 19 @13.912s 0%: 0.041+3.7+0.079 ms clock, 0.33+0/3.9/0.73+0.63 ms cpu, 47->47->27 MB, 47 MB goal, 0 MB stacks, 0 MB globals, 8 P
gc 20 @13.959s 0%: 0.039+29+0.095 ms clock, 0.31+0/29/0.98+0.76 ms cpu, 59->59->33 MB, 59 MB goal, 0 MB stacks, 0 MB globals, 8 P
gc 21 @14.120s 0%: 0.17+25+0.008 ms clock, 1.4+0/1.4/25+0.070 ms cpu, 67->67->7 MB, 67 MB goal, 0 MB stacks, 0 MB globals, 8 P
gc 22 @14.151s 0%: 0.33+2.0+0.003 ms clock, 2.6+0.24/2.9/0.50+0.028 ms cpu, 22->23->10 MB, 23 MB goal, 0 MB stacks, 0 MB globals, 8 P
gc 23 @14.160s 0%: 0.15+2.5+0.058 ms clock, 1.2+0/2.8/0.98+0.46 ms cpu, 33->33->15 MB, 33 MB goal, 0 MB stacks, 0 MB globals, 8 P
gc 24 @14.166s 0%: 0.18+3.4+0.12 ms clock, 1.4+0/3.7/0.78+1.0 ms cpu, 31->31->18 MB, 31 MB goal, 0 MB stacks, 0 MB globals, 8 P
gc 25 @14.174s 0%: 0.12+5.7+0.15 ms clock, 1.0+0/6.1/0.61+1.2 ms cpu, 38->38->22 MB, 38 MB goal, 0 MB stacks, 0 MB globals, 8 P
gc 26 @14.185s 0%: 0.13+40+0.067 ms clock, 1.0+0/40/0.98+0.53 ms cpu, 47->47->27 MB, 47 MB goal, 0 MB stacks, 0 MB globals, 8 P
gc 27 @14.234s 0%: 0.15+5.4+0.14 ms clock, 1.2+0/5.6/0.82+1.1 ms cpu, 58->58->33 MB, 58 MB goal, 0 MB stacks, 0 MB globals, 8 P
gc 28 @14.250s 0%: 0.038+43+0.003 ms clock, 0.30+0/43/0.85+0.024 ms cpu, 72->72->41 MB, 72 MB goal, 0 MB stacks, 0 MB globals, 8 P
gc 29 @14.306s 0%: 0.067+33+0.11 ms clock, 0.53+0/0.82/33+0.88 ms cpu, 89->89->50 MB, 89 MB goal, 0 MB stacks, 0 MB globals, 8 P
gc 30 @14.355s 0%: 0.045+11+0.11 ms clock, 0.36+0/1.2/12+0.94 ms cpu, 110->110->62 MB, 111 MB goal, 0 MB stacks, 0 MB globals, 8 P
gc 31 @14.384s 0%: 0.044+50+0.15 ms clock, 0.35+0/50/0.77+1.2 ms cpu, 138->138->77 MB, 138 MB goal, 0 MB stacks, 0 MB globals, 8 P
gc 32 @14.459s 0%: 0.040+53+0.13 ms clock, 0.32+0/53/0.83+1.0 ms cpu, 171->171->96 MB, 171 MB goal, 0 MB stacks, 0 MB globals, 8 P
gc 33 @14.541s 0%: 0.042+18+0.11 ms clock, 0.34+0/18/1.1+0.91 ms cpu, 214->214->120 MB, 214 MB goal, 0 MB stacks, 0 MB globals, 8 P
gc 34 @14.591s 0%: 0.045+29+0.12 ms clock, 0.36+0/0.87/29+0.97 ms cpu, 267->267->149 MB, 267 MB goal, 0 MB stacks, 0 MB globals, 8 P
gc 35 @14.667s 0%: 0.079+83+0.036 ms clock, 0.63+0/83/0.79+0.29 ms cpu, 333->333->186 MB, 333 MB goal, 0 MB stacks, 0 MB globals, 8 P
gc 36 @14.803s 0%: 0.086+33+0.16 ms clock, 0.69+0/33/1.3+1.3 ms cpu, 415->415->232 MB, 415 MB goal, 0 MB stacks, 0 MB globals, 8 P
gc 37 @14.911s 0%: 0.044+82+0.085 ms clock, 0.35+0/0.94/82+0.68 ms cpu, 519->519->289 MB, 519 MB goal, 0 MB stacks, 0 MB globals, 8 P
gc 38 @15.076s 0%: 0.038+133+0.30 ms clock, 0.30+0/133/0.95+2.4 ms cpu, 648->648->361 MB, 648 MB goal, 0 MB stacks, 0 MB globals, 8 P
gc 39 @15.314s 0%: 0.044+69+0.003 ms clock, 0.35+0/69/2.2+0.031 ms cpu, 809->809->450 MB, 809 MB goal, 0 MB stacks, 0 MB globals, 8 P
gc 40 @15.500s 0%: 0.045+154+0.32 ms clock, 0.36+0/154/1.1+2.5 ms cpu, 1011->1011->563 MB, 1011 MB goal, 0 MB stacks, 0 MB globals, 8 P
gc 41 @15.831s 0%: 0.049+1057+0.007 ms clock, 0.39+0/1.9/1057+0.058 ms cpu, 1263->1263->703 MB, 1263 MB goal, 0 MB stacks, 0 MB globals, 8 P
gc 42 @17.113s 2%: 0.039+2120+0.064 ms clock, 0.31+0/2120/1.6+0.51 ms cpu, 1578->1578->878 MB, 1578 MB goal, 0 MB stacks, 0 MB globals, 8 P
gc 43 @19.651s 4%: 0.057+6700+0.006 ms clock, 0.46+0/6697/1.3+0.048 ms cpu, 1972->1972->1097 MB, 1972 MB goal, 0 MB stacks, 0 MB globals, 8 P
Killed

We can see how the heap memory is increasing #->#-># MB

But when using pack 0.29 with the same configuration we get the following output

Creating builder with the following buildpacks:
-> samples/[email protected]
-> samples/[email protected]
-> samples/[email protected]
-> [email protected]
-> samples/[email protected]
-> samples/[email protected]
-> samples/[email protected]
gc 7 @6.168s 0%: 0.042+1.5+0.16 ms clock, 0.34+0/1.7/0.89+1.3 ms cpu, 5->5->3 MB, 5 MB goal, 0 MB stacks, 0 MB globals, 8 P
gc 8 @6.178s 0%: 0.041+4.6+0.004 ms clock, 0.33+0/4.2/1.4+0.033 ms cpu, 7->7->3 MB, 6 MB goal, 0 MB stacks, 0 MB globals, 8 P
gc 9 @6.190s 0%: 0.043+1.5+0.006 ms clock, 0.34+0.53/1.4/1.0+0.048 ms cpu, 6->6->4 MB, 7 MB goal, 0 MB stacks, 0 MB globals, 8 P
gc 10 @6.198s 0%: 0.043+18+0.080 ms clock, 0.34+0/18/0.83+0.64 ms cpu, 9->9->5 MB, 9 MB goal, 0 MB stacks, 0 MB globals, 8 P
gc 11 @6.231s 0%: 0.048+3.4+0.24 ms clock, 0.38+0.16/1.7/0+1.9 ms cpu, 9->10->4 MB, 10 MB goal, 0 MB stacks, 0 MB globals, 8 P
gc 12 @6.245s 0%: 0.041+4.7+0.31 ms clock, 0.32+0/4.4/0.98+2.5 ms cpu, 9->9->4 MB, 9 MB goal, 0 MB stacks, 0 MB globals, 8 P
gc 13 @6.264s 0%: 0.073+3.5+0.005 ms clock, 0.58+0/3.2/2.1+0.043 ms cpu, 10->10->5 MB, 9 MB goal, 0 MB stacks, 0 MB globals, 8 P
gc 14 @6.296s 0%: 0.068+15+0.10 ms clock, 0.54+0/15/0.97+0.82 ms cpu, 15->15->7 MB, 12 MB goal, 0 MB stacks, 0 MB globals, 8 P
gc 15 @6.319s 0%: 0.036+9.3+0.005 ms clock, 0.29+0/9.6/1.3+0.040 ms cpu, 14->14->9 MB, 15 MB goal, 0 MB stacks, 0 MB globals, 8 P
gc 16 @6.338s 0%: 0.036+1.8+0.075 ms clock, 0.29+0/1.9/0.88+0.60 ms cpu, 17->17->10 MB, 18 MB goal, 0 MB stacks, 0 MB globals, 8 P
gc 17 @6.349s 0%: 0.042+12+0.092 ms clock, 0.33+0/12/1.0+0.73 ms cpu, 20->20->12 MB, 21 MB goal, 0 MB stacks, 0 MB globals, 8 P
gc 18 @6.377s 0%: 0.035+2.3+0.090 ms clock, 0.28+0/2.6/0.87+0.72 ms cpu, 25->25->15 MB, 25 MB goal, 0 MB stacks, 0 MB globals, 8 P
gc 19 @6.395s 0%: 0.035+32+0.099 ms clock, 0.28+0/32/0.67+0.79 ms cpu, 31->31->18 MB, 30 MB goal, 0 MB stacks, 0 MB globals, 8 P
gc 20 @6.448s 0%: 0.037+21+0.10 ms clock, 0.29+0/21/0.88+0.82 ms cpu, 38->38->22 MB, 37 MB goal, 0 MB stacks, 0 MB globals, 8 P
gc 21 @6.499s 0%: 0.038+5.3+0.18 ms clock, 0.30+0/5.6/1.0+1.4 ms cpu, 47->47->46 MB, 45 MB goal, 0 MB stacks, 0 MB globals, 8 P
Adding buildpack [email protected] (diffID=sha256:89ae2cc6518d1b76c06062be7fb5cd02405f155f9071f1d977cf821cbf73c61c)
Adding buildpack samples/[email protected] (diffID=sha256:a17feab82bbb1ec651086f769d4178125792d5dbf8913672222c958eab4ee5c0)
Adding buildpack samples/[email protected] (diffID=sha256:7c7dd7e20b20ec6da8b4c1a7d879d5e142e8380e6ae1486a99b72f203eadcdd3)
Adding buildpack samples/[email protected] (diffID=sha256:b4f741f100ff0cda0834efc43b8e61dccf08d538807c3359555f4db126dda1ad)
Adding buildpack samples/[email protected] (diffID=sha256:42b8a74a77084e1e9a7cbbd75a1418271bcf907359421b4a29a1e391bf35b34c)
Adding buildpack samples/[email protected] (diffID=sha256:851c15ba18fddb4d49b4759ba18c5e09c5de0e8b932f9350337bd2b9d6d695e2)
Adding buildpack samples/[email protected] (diffID=sha256:9d6b31f4fb43fd948fe010dc0e3f8dac6d2b2bdd8a2a1d9097ae9c4e3d2b7f0e)
Successfully created builder image my-builder:jammy
Tip: Run pack build <image-name> --builder my-builder:jammy to use this builder

Digging into a little bit more, I noticed the problem must be happening reading the tar created during processing the buildpacks.

Screenshot 2023-09-05 at 5 07 39 PM

The problem was here, using io.ReadAll was probably trying to load the whole file in memory! replacing that part, and testing again the binary

Creating builder with the following buildpacks:
-> [email protected]
-> samples/[email protected]
-> samples/[email protected]
-> samples/[email protected]
-> samples/[email protected]
-> samples/[email protected]
-> samples/[email protected]
gc 8 @106.374s 0%: 0.048+0.92+0.065 ms clock, 0.39+0.089/0.97/0.96+0.52 ms cpu, 5->5->2 MB, 5 MB goal, 0 MB stacks, 0 MB globals, 8 P
gc 9 @106.382s 0%: 0.039+6.2+0.20 ms clock, 0.31+0/5.9/0.65+1.6 ms cpu, 5->5->3 MB, 5 MB goal, 0 MB stacks, 0 MB globals, 8 P
gc 10 @106.397s 0%: 0.043+2.2+0.17 ms clock, 0.35+0/2.4/1.2+1.4 ms cpu, 6->6->3 MB, 6 MB goal, 0 MB stacks, 0 MB globals, 8 P
gc 11 @106.406s 0%: 0.046+2.2+0.14 ms clock, 0.37+0/2.2/0.97+1.1 ms cpu, 7->7->4 MB, 8 MB goal, 0 MB stacks, 0 MB globals, 8 P
gc 12 @106.423s 0%: 0.037+1.4+0.097 ms clock, 0.29+0/1.3/0.88+0.77 ms cpu, 9->9->3 MB, 9 MB goal, 0 MB stacks, 0 MB globals, 8 P
gc 13 @106.432s 0%: 0.039+9.2+0.17 ms clock, 0.31+0/8.6/0.78+1.4 ms cpu, 6->6->3 MB, 6 MB goal, 0 MB stacks, 0 MB globals, 8 P
gc 14 @106.453s 0%: 0.048+7.9+0.17 ms clock, 0.38+0/2.4/0.22+1.4 ms cpu, 8->9->4 MB, 9 MB goal, 0 MB stacks, 0 MB globals, 8 P
gc 15 @106.468s 0%: 0.040+2.4+0.16 ms clock, 0.32+0/2.5/0.78+1.3 ms cpu, 10->10->5 MB, 10 MB goal, 0 MB stacks, 0 MB globals, 8 P
gc 16 @106.503s 0%: 0.043+6.3+0.21 ms clock, 0.34+0/7.2/0+1.7 ms cpu, 15->15->7 MB, 15 MB goal, 0 MB stacks, 0 MB globals, 8 P
gc 17 @106.546s 0%: 0.051+8.1+0.34 ms clock, 0.41+0/2.0/0.74+2.7 ms cpu, 22->22->17 MB, 22 MB goal, 0 MB stacks, 0 MB globals, 8 P
gc 18 @106.591s 0%: 0.038+6.9+0.003 ms clock, 0.31+0/7.1/1.4+0.031 ms cpu, 40->40->15 MB, 40 MB goal, 0 MB stacks, 0 MB globals, 8 P
gc 19 @106.619s 0%: 0.065+72+0.097 ms clock, 0.52+0/73/1.8+0.77 ms cpu, 31->31->18 MB, 31 MB goal, 0 MB stacks, 0 MB globals, 8 P
gc 20 @106.722s 0%: 0.046+12+0.13 ms clock, 0.36+0/12/0.64+1.0 ms cpu, 38->38->22 MB, 38 MB goal, 0 MB stacks, 0 MB globals, 8 P
gc 21 @106.755s 0%: 0.044+10+0.13 ms clock, 0.35+0/3.7/15+1.0 ms cpu, 47->47->27 MB, 47 MB goal, 0 MB stacks, 0 MB globals, 8 P
gc 22 @106.827s 0%: 0.043+25+0.091 ms clock, 0.34+0/1.3/24+0.73 ms cpu, 59->59->33 MB, 59 MB goal, 0 MB stacks, 0 MB globals, 8 P
Adding buildpack [email protected] (diffID=sha256:89ae2cc6518d1b76c06062be7fb5cd02405f155f9071f1d977cf821cbf73c61c)
Adding buildpack samples/[email protected] (diffID=sha256:a17feab82bbb1ec651086f769d4178125792d5dbf8913672222c958eab4ee5c0)
Adding buildpack samples/[email protected] (diffID=sha256:7c7dd7e20b20ec6da8b4c1a7d879d5e142e8380e6ae1486a99b72f203eadcdd3)
Adding buildpack samples/[email protected] (diffID=sha256:b4f741f100ff0cda0834efc43b8e61dccf08d538807c3359555f4db126dda1ad)
Adding buildpack samples/[email protected] (diffID=sha256:42b8a74a77084e1e9a7cbbd75a1418271bcf907359421b4a29a1e391bf35b34c)
Adding buildpack samples/[email protected] (diffID=sha256:851c15ba18fddb4d49b4759ba18c5e09c5de0e8b932f9350337bd2b9d6d695e2)
Adding buildpack samples/[email protected] (diffID=sha256:9d6b31f4fb43fd948fe010dc0e3f8dac6d2b2bdd8a2a1d9097ae9c4e3d2b7f0e)
Successfully created builder image my-builder:jammy-0.30
Tip: Run pack build <image-name> --builder my-builder:jammy-0.30 to use this builder

@mmtevelde
Copy link
Author

Awesome, thank you so much!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
status/ready Issue ready to be worked on. type/bug Issue that reports an unexpected behaviour.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants