You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello, I'm considering the use of a Sonoff device with electricity consumption monitoring capabilities. My intention is to utilize this feature for automatic calibration and as an endpoint indicator, particularly when the blind reaches its end position. I'm unsure if this aligns with your perspective and if it even would be usable. The cost difference between the version with power consumption measurement and the one without is approximately 1-2 dollars. I'd really appreciate your insights on whether this choice makes sense.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
bzumik1
changed the title
[Improvement] Electricity Consumption as End Sensor
[Improvement] Electricity Consumption as End Position Sensor
Nov 28, 2023
I have just found out that that is actually what sonoff is doing. It would be really nice to add this feature. I will be happy to help with testing if someone will add it.
In this configuration, the blinds would move up and down 5 times, and the time for the up and down movement would be calculated as the average of these motions. However, I am uncertain if this approach will be sufficiently precise. If the consumption can be measured quickly and accurately, we could also consider adding calibration for the tilt, as the consumption during tilting will be lower than when the blinds are fully moving up. Another idea is to implement stuck detection. If the sensor detects a higher load than usual, the blinds could stop, similar to the safety feature in standing desks.
Hello, I'm considering the use of a Sonoff device with electricity consumption monitoring capabilities. My intention is to utilize this feature for automatic calibration and as an endpoint indicator, particularly when the blind reaches its end position. I'm unsure if this aligns with your perspective and if it even would be usable. The cost difference between the version with power consumption measurement and the one without is approximately 1-2 dollars. I'd really appreciate your insights on whether this choice makes sense.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: