You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
\documentclass{article}
\begin{document}
\begin{eqnarray}
x \nonumber\\% no number&+& y \\% this should get (1)&+& z \nonumber% no number\end{eqnarray}
\begin{eqnarray}
x \nonumber\\% no number&+& y_1 \\% this should get (1)&+& y_2 \\% this should get (2)&+& z \nonumber% no number\end{eqnarray}
\end{document}
LaTeXML seems to be neutralizing two rows for a given \nonumber?
The second example is an even more interesting mix, as the resulting table gets two <tbody> containers, and the deposited (2) tag is floated to the top row - which has the x with \nonumber.
I'm not sure if we have regressed or this was also a problem in pre-0.8.8 releases. I've encountered it during my latest contracting work.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
A minimal example to reproduce:
LaTeXML seems to be neutralizing two rows for a given
\nonumber
?The second example is an even more interesting mix, as the resulting table gets two
<tbody>
containers, and the deposited(2)
tag is floated to the top row - which has thex
with\nonumber
.I'm not sure if we have regressed or this was also a problem in pre-0.8.8 releases. I've encountered it during my latest contracting work.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: