You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I think a useful feature would be to add a database option (or even a csv option) for functional annotation. Each functional annotation would be a row, with a column for its ORF identifier, its genome/sample source, its gene family hit, and its e-value.
I think this feature would be very useful when wrangling with lots of genomes or metagenomic samples. The resulting database would be a lot easier to search than all the fasta files. It would also make it easy to see alternative annotations for the same ORF and the different e-values.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think a useful feature would be to add a database option (or even a csv option) for functional annotation. Each functional annotation would be a row, with a column for its ORF identifier, its genome/sample source, its gene family hit, and its e-value.
I think this feature would be very useful when wrangling with lots of genomes or metagenomic samples. The resulting database would be a lot easier to search than all the fasta files. It would also make it easy to see alternative annotations for the same ORF and the different e-values.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: