Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Discrepancy in possible values for libraryType #10

Open
messersc opened this issue May 24, 2017 · 1 comment
Open

Discrepancy in possible values for libraryType #10

messersc opened this issue May 24, 2017 · 1 comment

Comments

@messersc
Copy link

At the moment,

biomedsheets/io_tsv/base.py allows
'WES', 'WGS', 'Panel_seq', 'mRNA_seq', 'total_RNA_seq'.

However, biomedsheets/data/std_fields.json defines the following:

        "libraryType": {
            "docs": "Rough classificiation of the library type",
            "key": "libraryType",
            "type": "enum",
            "choices": [
                "Panel-seq",
                "WES",
                "WGS",
                "mRNA-seq",
                "tRNA-seq",
                "other"
            ]
        },

The former is the one that is used by cubi_pipeline to parse the tsv. These definitions should be unified.

@ericblanc20
Copy link

Some additional protocols should perhaps be added:

  • ribodeplRNA_seq: ribodepletion/zeroribo RNA sequencing
  • miRNA_seq: microRNA sequencing
  • nascentRNA_seq: Global Run On (GRO-seq) sequencing
  • others?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants