You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Rationale: In trying to apply the BIDS format to our MR database, we noticed that the current modality labeling schemes of BIDS 1.0 raises some confusion for some of our scans. Particularly, a consensus of many anatomical MR output was missing or not consequent across different sequences. Looking into the BIDS mailing list, it turns out that we were not the only one having these issues. To our opinion, most of the confusion stems from the intermixed use of sequence-, contrasts- and signal- labels.
To prevent confusion while still being able to fit a format to all possible scan types, we propose the following changes for BIDS 2.0 and where possible for backwards compatibility with BIDS 1.0:
All text in lowercase.
Punctuation marks:
underscore (_) : before each prefix
dash (-): after a prefix, to add labels, but not numbers!
‘parent’ labels
_out: referring to scanner output: in terms of volumes (regardless of how these are generated).
_seq: referring to the MR sequence that generated the volumes (with the possibility to add modifier labels)
_gen: referring to the result image that is generated/calculated with the output volumes
To prevent confusion we suggest to discard labelling for the specific ‘signal’ as modality (e.g. T1w, T2w, T2star). Often, scans are not purely t1w or t2w. Also, they might differ multiple output volumes for a specific sequence, resulting in messy and unclear labeling.
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bids-discussion/BCC1A813-0207-4D16-B095-4311B50F090D%40gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer
Rationale: In trying to apply the BIDS format to our MR database, we noticed that the current modality labeling schemes of BIDS 1.0 raises some confusion for some of our scans. Particularly, a consensus of many anatomical MR output was missing or not consequent across different sequences. Looking into the BIDS mailing list, it turns out that we were not the only one having these issues. To our opinion, most of the confusion stems from the intermixed use of sequence-, contrasts- and signal- labels.
To prevent confusion while still being able to fit a format to all possible scan types, we propose the following changes for BIDS 2.0 and where possible for backwards compatibility with BIDS 1.0:
Label specs
format:
- sub01_… _out-{out-label1}--{out-label}_seq-{seq-label}-{seq-modifier}gen-{gen-label} … nii.gz
_out
_seq
_gen
Examples
Original authors: Martijn Mulder
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: