Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DK2 Support #35

Open
slawrence opened this issue Aug 8, 2014 · 8 comments
Open

DK2 Support #35

slawrence opened this issue Aug 8, 2014 · 8 comments

Comments

@slawrence
Copy link

Any plans to support DK2 (SDK 0.4)?

@loktar00
Copy link

+1 wondering that as well.

@benvanik
Copy link
Owner

Probably not; Chrome killed NPAPI so vr.js doesn't work there any more :( Vlad and Brandon are making awesome progress on WebVR, though, so you should be able to grab their Firefox/Chromium builds and play around with that.

There's still the possibility of porting the javascript driver to the chrome.hid, though I probably won't get around to that.

@loktar00
Copy link

Ah that sucks, I assumed as much though, webvr is quite promising. Regardless, thanks for the work on the vr.js version.

@captainkw
Copy link

Thanks for the work on the vr.js as well, it made a lot of things really easy for us as well. Will follow up on Firefox/Chromium builds and hopefully their WebVR format gets adopted into the main trunk soon!

@benvanik
Copy link
Owner

Good luck! Excited to see a lot more fun web VR! I'll try to update the
vr.js main page tonight for others also looking for the same info.

On Thu Aug 21 2014 at 1:23:03 PM Kuangwei Hwang [email protected]
wrote:

Thanks for the work on the vr.js as well, it made a lot of things really
easy for us as well. Will follow up on Firefox/Chromium builds and
hopefully their WebVR format gets adopted into the main trunk soon!


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#35 (comment).

@CodingCooky
Copy link

see a branch from NPVR for DK2 SDK0.2.4 support:
CodingCooky/npvr

@captainkw
Copy link

This is good stuff @CodingCooky, will give it a try. But by any means did you mean SDK 0.4.2 instead of 0.2.4?

@CodingCooky
Copy link

@captainkw:
You are totally correct. I was meaning SDK 0.4.2. Thanks for the info - i updated the comments on the other projects.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants