Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Dealing with confounders #3

Open
oharar opened this issue Sep 17, 2018 · 1 comment
Open

Dealing with confounders #3

oharar opened this issue Sep 17, 2018 · 1 comment

Comments

@oharar
Copy link

oharar commented Sep 17, 2018

One topic that isn't touched upon is confounding variables. I've use models selection on them in the past, because I don't really care about them, but some might be important and dropping minor confounders should give more power elsewhere. Of course, regularisation does the same thing.

I guess my main point is that confounders are slightly different, so might have to be dealt with, even if you end up with 2 lines saying "treat them like everything else in the model, but interpret them differently".

@BertvanderVeen
Copy link

To add to this; this came to mind for me as one of the few scenarios in which information criteria could actually be useful. Of course penalized regression would help with this too, but in cases where n>p and one fits a couple of competing models without penalization, information criteria could be used instead.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants