Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Document workaround on main_binary first run (#57) #58

Closed
epage opened this issue Nov 5, 2018 · 2 comments
Closed

Document workaround on main_binary first run (#57) #58

epage opened this issue Nov 5, 2018 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement Improve the expected

Comments

@epage
Copy link
Contributor

epage commented Nov 5, 2018

#57 / #4 is about a performance vs correctness issue in assert_cmd. We should document the workaround for people who want the performance at the cost of correctness (or rather, they can ensure the correctness).

In how we document this: I noticed #6's documented workaround is in the cargo module. The challenge is if people look at the trait or functions directly. We should find a way to address that for that workaround and this one.

@epage epage added the enhancement Improve the expected label Nov 5, 2018
@epage
Copy link
Contributor Author

epage commented Nov 20, 2018

We should also document the lack of features control. See #59.

@epage
Copy link
Contributor Author

epage commented Nov 21, 2018

Now documented as of #62

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement Improve the expected
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant