Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enterprise User Feedback #78

Open
chelma opened this issue Jun 30, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Enterprise User Feedback #78

chelma opened this issue Jun 30, 2023 · 0 comments
Assignees

Comments

@chelma
Copy link
Collaborator

chelma commented Jun 30, 2023

Had a great discussion with a potential enterprise user; capturing their thoughts/requests/concerns here for posterity:

  1. User requested a way to provision the IAM resources separately from the rest of the AWS Resources. This is due to their Security Team having permission to perform iam::* operations, but their DevOps teams not having those permissions. One solution here is a separate command (setup-iam, etc) that spins up an IAM Resource stack that the other stacks consume during create-cluster. Will have to investigate which existing resources need IAM changes.
  2. User requested the ability to set the CIDR for the capture VPC
  3. User requested making the filtering rules configurable (e.g. "only traffic from this CIDR")
  4. User requested a way to provide their own cert/DNS name for the Viewer's LB. They were happy with providing an ACM ARN for the cert and dealing with the creation and storage, and acquiring the domain.
  5. User required that all S3 objects be KMS-encrypted (didn't need a specific key, just any KMS key)
  6. User would like SAML as an auth option eventually
  7. User would like the tool to support the usersElasticsearch and usersPrefix settings so Arkime Viewer can use shared authZ, this may remove the saml requirement if onprem multiviewer talking to aws is supported
  8. User would love better tools for pre-deployment cost estimation. We currently provide an indication of the main resources we're creating; we should combine that with public pricing info to give a ballpark monthly cost estimate.
  9. User indicated they want to install custom software in-container; we should provide them a bash file they can modify for special behavior, stick it in-container, and source it on container start.

In discussions afterwards, it became clear that making the config.ini files more user-accessible in a no-code way would save everyone time/pain. We'll need to look at how to provide a satisfactory experience for that.

@chelma chelma self-assigned this Jun 30, 2023
@chelma chelma changed the title Potential Enterprise User Feedback Enterprise User Feedback Jun 30, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant