You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I would like to leverage the Argilla webhooks feature to build functionality for an auxiliary application supporting my organization's Argilla deployment, which is deployed on a private organization space on Huggingface.
Connections to Argilla servers deployed in this manner via the SDK require the user to pass a Huggingface token. Currently, the webhook call made by the server does not support any custom configuration to add security headers, which prevents passthrough of the HF credential. This appears to prevent the use of the webhooks feature on Argilla deployments hosted in private HF spaces.
Describe the solution you'd like
Support for inclusion of Huggingface tokens in webhook calls, or some more general approach that enables webhook authentication for private Huggingface spaces
Describe alternatives you've considered
Deploy Argilla to a public HF space (not feasible for my org)
Self-host Argilla (cost and effort not justified just for this feature)
Additional context
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I would like to leverage the Argilla webhooks feature to build functionality for an auxiliary application supporting my organization's Argilla deployment, which is deployed on a private organization space on Huggingface.
Connections to Argilla servers deployed in this manner via the SDK require the user to pass a Huggingface token. Currently, the webhook call made by the server does not support any custom configuration to add security headers, which prevents passthrough of the HF credential. This appears to prevent the use of the webhooks feature on Argilla deployments hosted in private HF spaces.
Describe the solution you'd like
Support for inclusion of Huggingface tokens in webhook calls, or some more general approach that enables webhook authentication for private Huggingface spaces
Describe alternatives you've considered
Additional context
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: