Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add callback to with_exception_handling #32136

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Aug 15, 2024

Conversation

damccorm
Copy link
Contributor

@damccorm damccorm commented Aug 9, 2024

Allows users to define a callback to execute only on failure. Step 1 of #32137 though this is also a standalone feature

See full design here - https://docs.google.com/document/d/19ves6iv-m_6DFmePJZqYpLm-bCooPu6wQ-Ti6kAl2Jo/edit


Thank you for your contribution! Follow this checklist to help us incorporate your contribution quickly and easily:

  • Mention the appropriate issue in your description (for example: addresses #123), if applicable. This will automatically add a link to the pull request in the issue. If you would like the issue to automatically close on merging the pull request, comment fixes #<ISSUE NUMBER> instead.
  • Update CHANGES.md with noteworthy changes.
  • If this contribution is large, please file an Apache Individual Contributor License Agreement.

See the Contributor Guide for more tips on how to make review process smoother.

To check the build health, please visit https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/master/.test-infra/BUILD_STATUS.md

GitHub Actions Tests Status (on master branch)

Build python source distribution and wheels
Python tests
Java tests
Go tests

See CI.md for more information about GitHub Actions CI or the workflows README to see a list of phrases to trigger workflows.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the python label Aug 9, 2024
@damccorm damccorm marked this pull request as ready for review August 11, 2024 14:13
Copy link
Contributor

Checks are failing. Will not request review until checks are succeeding. If you'd like to override that behavior, comment assign set of reviewers

@damccorm
Copy link
Contributor Author

assign set of reviewers

Copy link
Contributor

Assigning reviewers. If you would like to opt out of this review, comment assign to next reviewer:

R: @tvalentyn for label python.

Available commands:

  • stop reviewer notifications - opt out of the automated review tooling
  • remind me after tests pass - tag the comment author after tests pass
  • waiting on author - shift the attention set back to the author (any comment or push by the author will return the attention set to the reviewers)

The PR bot will only process comments in the main thread (not review comments).

sdks/python/apache_beam/transforms/core_test.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
raise Exception(f'Failed to pass in correct element, received {el}')
f = open(tmp_path, "a")
logging.warning(tmp_path)
f.write(file_contents)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I found this didn't work. I'm not totally sure why, but I think it is because of how the scoping of the function works as it is passed through Beam. Somehow, it seems like its referencing a copy of the variable, I'm guessing it gets copied by value somewhere along the way... Maybe related to us spinning up new threads to handle pieces of this logic?

Regardless, I'm inclined to leave it rather than digging in further since it is still effectively testing correctness at this point.

@damccorm damccorm merged commit 2d14076 into master Aug 15, 2024
87 of 89 checks passed
@damccorm damccorm deleted the users/damccorm/exception-handling-callback branch August 15, 2024 20:51
reeba212 pushed a commit to reeba212/beam that referenced this pull request Dec 4, 2024
* Add callback to with_exception_handling

* Format

* Format

* Implement feedback
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants