Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Performance Regression or Improvement: pytorch_image_classification_benchmarks-resnet101-mean_load_model_latency_milli_secs:mean_load_model_latency_milli_secs #29112

Closed
github-actions bot opened this issue Oct 23, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels
awaiting triage perf-alert Automatically filed performance-related alerts.

Comments

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Performance change found in the
test: pytorch_image_classification_benchmarks-resnet101-mean_load_model_latency_milli_secs for the metric: mean_load_model_latency_milli_secs.

For more information on how to triage the alerts, please look at
Triage performance alert issues section of the README.

Test description: Pytorch image classification on 50k images of size 224 x 224 with resnet 101.
Test link -

test : 'apache_beam.testing.benchmarks.inference.pytorch_image_classification_benchmarks',

Test dashboard - http://metrics.beam.apache.org/d/ZpS8Uf44z/python-ml-runinference-benchmarks?orgId=1&viewPanel=7


timestamp: Mon Oct 23 05:03:54 2023, metric_value: 67558.10
timestamp: Mon Oct 23 04:30:07 2023, metric_value: 68828.22
timestamp: Mon Oct 23 04:19:35 2023, metric_value: 68248.07
timestamp: Sun Oct 22 18:24:05 2023, metric_value: 70679.95
timestamp: Sun Oct 22 06:00:37 2023, metric_value: 68930.44
timestamp: Sun Oct 22 04:30:11 2023, metric_value: 71490.65
timestamp: Sun Oct 22 04:20:04 2023, metric_value: 68338.61
timestamp: Sat Oct 21 18:23:07 2023, metric_value: 71755.39
timestamp: Sat Oct 21 04:29:30 2023, metric_value: 68748.29
timestamp: Sat Oct 21 04:22:45 2023, metric_value: 70340.81
timestamp: Sat Oct 21 04:18:20 2023, metric_value: 71591.09 <---- Anomaly
timestamp: Fri Oct 20 18:24:10 2023, metric_value: 78505.62
timestamp: Fri Oct 20 04:29:20 2023, metric_value: 75849.63
timestamp: Fri Oct 20 04:28:12 2023, metric_value: 72637.09
timestamp: Thu Oct 19 18:26:07 2023, metric_value: 96818.89
timestamp: Thu Oct 19 10:44:33 2023, metric_value: 76664.97
timestamp: Thu Oct 19 04:31:55 2023, metric_value: 84824.80
timestamp: Thu Oct 19 04:21:19 2023, metric_value: 76400.78
timestamp: Wed Oct 18 18:25:37 2023, metric_value: 84549.59
timestamp: Wed Oct 18 13:57:30 2023, metric_value: 86576.71
timestamp: Wed Oct 18 11:01:41 2023, metric_value: 80095.78

@github-actions github-actions bot added awaiting triage perf-alert Automatically filed performance-related alerts. labels Oct 23, 2023
@AnandInguva
Copy link
Contributor

I don't see any obvious changes to Beam during Oct 20th and Oct 21st -
image

@AnandInguva
Copy link
Contributor

image
there is no actual regression. Closing as noise.

@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the 2.52.0 Release milestone Oct 26, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
awaiting triage perf-alert Automatically filed performance-related alerts.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant