Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Bug]: beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_Flink is flakes in org.apache.beam.sdk.transforms.GroupByKeyTest$BasicTests.testAfterProcessingTimeContinuationTriggerUsingState #22913

Closed
jrmccluskey opened this issue Aug 26, 2022 · 8 comments

Comments

@jrmccluskey
Copy link
Contributor

jrmccluskey commented Aug 26, 2022

What happened?

org.apache.beam.sdk.transforms.GroupByKeyTest > org.apache.beam.sdk.transforms.GroupByKeyTest$BasicTests.testAfterProcessingTimeContinuationTriggerUsingState tests is flaky in the Java Flink ValidatesRunner PosCommit suite.

https://ci-beam.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_Flink/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/org.apache.beam.sdk.transforms/GroupByKeyTest$BasicTests/testAfterProcessingTimeContinuationTriggerUsingState/

Issue Priority

Priority: 1

Issue Component

Component: test-failures

@kennknowles
Copy link
Member

Not failing today. It does have some flakes, but not this one from what I can see.

@kennknowles
Copy link
Member

Wait, I read it wrong. This is exactly the flake.

@kennknowles kennknowles changed the title [Bug]: beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_Flink is failing [Bug]: beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_Flink is flakey Sep 13, 2022
@TheNeuralBit
Copy link
Member

org.apache.beam.sdk.transforms.ParDoLifecycleTest.testTeardownCalledAfterExceptionInStartBundleStateful is tracked in #21266

Maybe this should just track the GroupByKey one? It does look quite flaky:
image

@TheNeuralBit TheNeuralBit changed the title [Bug]: beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_Flink is flakey [Bug]: beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_Flink is flakes in org.apache.beam.sdk.transforms.GroupByKeyTest$BasicTests.testAfterProcessingTimeContinuationTriggerUsingState Sep 21, 2022
@TheNeuralBit
Copy link
Member

Updated the description so this just tracks the GroupByKeyTest failure. Let's use #21266 to track the ParDoLifecycleTest flake

@apilloud
Copy link
Member

This is the top flaky test in the suite. Recent failures:
https://ci-beam.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_Flink/10960/testReport/org.apache.beam.sdk.transforms/GroupByKeyTest$BasicTests/testAfterProcessingTimeContinuationTriggerUsingState/
https://ci-beam.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_ValidatesRunner_Flink/10961/testReport/org.apache.beam.sdk.transforms/GroupByKeyTest$BasicTests/testAfterProcessingTimeContinuationTriggerUsingState/

java.lang.AssertionError: Second Triggered sum/Values/Values/Map/ParMultiDo(Anonymous).output: 
Expected: iterable with items [<42>] in any order
     but: no match for: <84>
	at org.apache.beam.sdk.testing.PAssert$PAssertionSite.capture(PAssert.java:175)
	at org.apache.beam.sdk.testing.PAssert.that(PAssert.java:460)
	at org.apache.beam.sdk.testing.PAssert.that(PAssert.java:452)
	at org.apache.beam.sdk.transforms.GroupByKeyTest$BasicTests.testAfterProcessingTimeContinuationTriggerUsingState(GroupByKeyTest.java:302)

@apilloud apilloud self-assigned this Oct 17, 2022
@apilloud
Copy link
Member

apilloud commented Nov 2, 2022

As much as I want to work on this, that hasn't happened in the last two weeks and I don't see it happening this year so I'm going to unassign it.

@liferoad
Copy link
Collaborator

2024-11-19T11:29:14.9513289Z > Task :runners:flink:1.19:validatesRunnerStreaming
2024-11-19T11:30:19.9507467Z 
2024-11-19T11:30:19.9510128Z org.apache.beam.sdk.transforms.GroupByKeyTest > org.apache.beam.sdk.transforms.GroupByKeyTest$BasicTests.testAfterProcessingTimeContinuationTriggerUsingState FAILED
2024-11-19T11:30:19.9512352Z     java.lang.AssertionError at GroupByKeyTest.java:302
2024-11-19T11:30:19.9513761Z         Caused by: java.lang.AssertionError at MatcherAssert.java:18

@liferoad liferoad self-assigned this Nov 19, 2024
@liferoad
Copy link
Collaborator

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants