Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

select tag with the most timestamp information #111

Open
jaakkopoyry opened this issue Jan 23, 2019 · 1 comment
Open

select tag with the most timestamp information #111

jaakkopoyry opened this issue Jan 23, 2019 · 1 comment

Comments

@jaakkopoyry
Copy link

Hi Andrew,

I really like how sort-photos evaluates a file for the oldest date in the exif data prior to sorting & renaming based on my chosen naming format. Hoping you can assist with something.

I have three images below (detailed photo exif info at the bottom of this note):
naming format: %Y-%m-%d__%H%M%S___DESCRIPTOR
00045.jpg got renamed 2000-09-13__114550___DESCRIPTOR.jpg as it's oldest date value was "2000:09:13 11:45:50", no name conflicts there.
00132.jpg got renamed 2000-09-13__120000___DESCRIPTOR.jpg as it was the first file with the "2000:09:13 12:00:00" timestamp. again, no name conflicts there.
00133.jpg got renamed 2000-09-13__120000___DESCRIPTOR_11.jpg since the filename "2000-09-13__120000___DESCRIPTOR.jpg" already existed.

If image 00133.jpg could utilize tag "Composite:SubSecCreateDate": "2000:09:13 12:00:00.189", the resulting filename could potentially become
2000-09-13__120000189___DESCRIPTOR.jpg instead, negating the need for the "_40" to differentiate.

Questions:

  1. Can sort-photos select & use the tag containing the most timestamp information? e.g. "Composite:SubSecCreateDate"
  2. Can sort-photos rename utilizing all of the digits in the longest tag? (I was able to do it directly with exiftool and the ${subsectime} value, but I find exiftool's syntax
    quite complex; sort-photos is much clearer.)
  3. If these features are not present in sort-photos currently, can they be added?

Thanks.

Detailed photo information:
00045.jpg
"SourceFile": "/Users/jaakopoyry/Desktop/sortphotos_test_4/00045.jpg",
"File:FileModifyDate": "2000:09:13 11:45:50-04:00",
"File:FileAccessDate": "2019:01:21 18:05:45-05:00",
"File:FileInodeChangeDate": "2019:01:21 18:05:34-05:00",
"EXIF:ModifyDate": "2000:09:13 20:21:40",
"EXIF:DateTimeOriginal": "2000:09:13 11:45:50",
"EXIF:CreateDate": "2000:09:13 11:45:50",
"IPTC:DateCreated": "2000:09:13",
"IPTC:TimeCreated": "11:45:50-05:00",
"Composite:DateTimeCreated": "2000:09:13 11:45:50-05:00"

00132.jpg
"SourceFile": "/Users/jaakopoyry/Desktop/sortphotos_test_4/00132.jpg",
"File:FileModifyDate": "2000:09:13 12:00:00-04:00",
"File:FileAccessDate": "2019:01:21 18:05:29-05:00",
"File:FileInodeChangeDate": "2019:01:21 18:05:34-05:00",
"EXIF:ModifyDate": "2000:09:13 21:02:24",
"EXIF:DateTimeOriginal": "2000:09:13 12:00:00",
"EXIF:CreateDate": "2000:09:13 12:00:00",
"EXIF:SubSecTime": 185,
"EXIF:SubSecTimeOriginal": 185,
"EXIF:SubSecTimeDigitized": 185,
"IPTC:DateCreated": "2000:09:13",
"IPTC:TimeCreated": "12:00:00-05:00",
"Composite:DateTimeCreated": "2000:09:13 12:00:00-05:00",
"Composite:SubSecCreateDate": "2000:09:13 12:00:00.185",
"Composite:SubSecDateTimeOriginal": "2000:09:13 12:00:00.185",
"Composite:SubSecModifyDate": "2000:09:13 21:02:24.185"

00133.jpg
"SourceFile": "/Users/jrb8/Desktop/sortphotos_test_4/00133.jpg",
"File:FileModifyDate": "2000:09:13 12:00:00-04:00",
"File:FileAccessDate": "2019:01:21 18:11:09-05:00",
"File:FileInodeChangeDate": "2019:01:21 18:05:34-05:00",
"EXIF:ModifyDate": "2000:09:13 21:02:24",
"EXIF:DateTimeOriginal": "2000:09:13 12:00:00",
"EXIF:CreateDate": "2000:09:13 12:00:00",
"EXIF:SubSecTime": 189,
"EXIF:SubSecTimeOriginal": 189,
"EXIF:SubSecTimeDigitized": 189,
"IPTC:DateCreated": "2000:09:13",
"IPTC:TimeCreated": "12:00:00-05:00",
"Composite:DateTimeCreated": "2000:09:13 12:00:00-05:00",
"Composite:SubSecCreateDate": "2000:09:13 12:00:00.189",
"Composite:SubSecDateTimeOriginal": "2000:09:13 12:00:00.189",
"Composite:SubSecModifyDate": "2000:09:13 21:02:24.189"

@andrewning
Copy link
Owner

Sorry for the delayed reply. I only review this repo when I dump off my photos and that isn't very often. No, it doesn't currently try to figure out which timestamp is longer. They are so many permutations of renaming preference that people have that I haven't really tried to wade into that.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants