pseudocode code $$ vs $

[HaydarJawad]

pseudo.txt
Hi Guys, not sure if you came across this issue. my pseudocode (belwo) works fine on $ on pseudocode.js editor . when i add $$ (as per advice) I lose 50% of it mainly the functions outside the curly brackets. any help appractetetd i have been spending hours with no success. Thank you

% This algorithm checks the axioms of probability for an AI image classification model
\begin{algorithm}
\caption{Check Probabilities of Image Classification Model}
\begin{algorithmic}
\PROCEDURE{CheckProbabilities}{$sample_space, event_A, event_B$}
\STATE $total_images \gets$ \CALL{Length}{$sample_space$}
\STATE $prob_A \gets$ \CALL{Length}{$event_A$} / $total_images$
\STATE $prob_B \gets$ \CALL{Length}{$event_B$} / $total_images$

\PROCEDURE{NonNegativity}{$prob$}
    \IF{$prob \geq 0$}
        \STATE \textbf{return} True
    \ELSE
        \STATE \textbf{return} False
    \ENDIF
\ENDPROCEDURE

\PROCEDURE{Normalisation}{$prob\_A, prob\_B$}
    \IF{$prob\_A + prob\_B = 1$}
        \STATE \textbf{return} True
    \ELSE
        \STATE \textbf{return} False
    \ENDIF
\ENDPROCEDURE

\PROCEDURE{Additivity}{$prob\_A, prob\_B$}
    \IF{$prob\_A + prob\_B \leq 1$}
        \STATE \textbf{return} True
    \ELSE
        \STATE \textbf{return} False
    \ENDIF
\ENDPROCEDURE

\STATE $is\_non\_negative \gets$ \CALL{NonNegativity}{$prob\_A$} \AND \CALL{NonNegativity}{$prob\_B$}
\STATE $is\_normalised \gets$ \CALL{Normalisation}{$prob\_A, prob\_B$}
\STATE $is\_additive \gets$ \CALL{Additivity}{$prob\_A, prob\_B$}

\IF{$is\_non\_negative$}
    \STATE \textbf{print}("Non-negativity check passed")
\ELSE
    \STATE \textbf{print}("Non-negativity check failed")
\ENDIF

\IF{$is\_normalised$}
    \STATE \textbf{print}("Normalisation check passed")
\ELSE
    \STATE \textbf{print}("Normalisation check failed")
\ENDIF

\IF{$is\_additive$}
    \STATE \textbf{print}("Additivity check passed")
\ELSE
    \STATE \textbf{print}("Additivity check failed")
\ENDIF

\STATE \textbf{print}("Probability of image being a cat: ", $prob\_A$)
\STATE \textbf{print}("Probability of image being a dog: ", $prob\_B$)

\ENDPROCEDURE
\end{algorithmic}
\end{algorithm}

[george-gca]

I also tried to make it work, but to no avail. This is really weird.

[HaydarJawad]

Thank you for trying, it's indeed strange !

…

On Mon, 10 Jun 2024 at 15:35, George ***@***.***> wrote: I also tried to make it work, but to no avail. This is really weird. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#2460 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AETEP7LWJRHFJETGPSMKGTDZGW2THAVCNFSM6AAAAABINQ4GG6VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43SRDJONRXK43TNFXW4Q3PNVWWK3TUHM4TOMRYGI2DS> . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[george-gca]

I tested changing the MathJax version used to tex-chtml-full, as stated in their docs, which was the one difference I could spot, but to no avail.

  mathjax:
    integrity:
      js: "sha256-kbAFUDxdHwlYv01zraGjvjNZayxKtdoiJ38bDTFJtaQ="
    local:
      fonts: "output/chtml/fonts/woff-v2/"
    url:
      fonts: "https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/mathjax@{{version}}/es5/output/chtml/fonts/woff-v2/"
      js: "https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/mathjax@{{version}}/es5/tex-chtml-full.js"
    version: "3.2.2"

I believe it is worth opening an issue in pseudocode repo asking for guidance in this.

[george-gca]

Also pasting it here so it is easier to copy:

% This algorithm checks the axioms of probability for an AI image classification model
\begin{algorithm}
\caption{Check Probabilities of Image Classification Model}
\begin{algorithmic}
\PROCEDURE{CheckProbabilities}{$sample\_space, event\_A, event\_B$}
    \STATE $total\_images \gets$ \CALL{Length}{$sample\_space$}
    \STATE $prob\_A \gets$ \CALL{Length}{$event\_A$} / $total\_images$
    \STATE $prob\_B \gets$ \CALL{Length}{$event\_B$} / $total\_images$

    \PROCEDURE{NonNegativity}{$prob$}
        \IF{$prob \geq 0$}
            \STATE \textbf{return} True
        \ELSE
            \STATE \textbf{return} False
        \ENDIF
    \ENDPROCEDURE

    \PROCEDURE{Normalisation}{$prob\_A, prob\_B$}
        \IF{$prob\_A + prob\_B = 1$}
            \STATE \textbf{return} True
        \ELSE
            \STATE \textbf{return} False
        \ENDIF
    \ENDPROCEDURE

    \PROCEDURE{Additivity}{$prob\_A, prob\_B$}
        \IF{$prob\_A + prob\_B \leq 1$}
            \STATE \textbf{return} True
        \ELSE
            \STATE \textbf{return} False
        \ENDIF
    \ENDPROCEDURE

    \STATE $is\_non\_negative \gets$ \CALL{NonNegativity}{$prob\_A$} \AND \CALL{NonNegativity}{$prob\_B$}
    \STATE $is\_normalised \gets$ \CALL{Normalisation}{$prob\_A, prob\_B$}
    \STATE $is\_additive \gets$ \CALL{Additivity}{$prob\_A, prob\_B$}

    \IF{$is\_non\_negative$}
        \STATE \textbf{print}("Non-negativity check passed")
    \ELSE
        \STATE \textbf{print}("Non-negativity check failed")
    \ENDIF

    \IF{$is\_normalised$}
        \STATE \textbf{print}("Normalisation check passed")
    \ELSE
        \STATE \textbf{print}("Normalisation check failed")
    \ENDIF

    \IF{$is\_additive$}
        \STATE \textbf{print}("Additivity check passed")
    \ELSE
        \STATE \textbf{print}("Additivity check failed")
    \ENDIF

    \STATE \textbf{print}("Probability of image being a cat: ", $prob\_A$)
    \STATE \textbf{print}("Probability of image being a dog: ", $prob\_B$)

\ENDPROCEDURE
\end{algorithmic}
\end{algorithm}

[HaydarJawad]

it works perfectly on https://saswat.padhi.me/pseudocode.js/. if you copy and paste it. only when you add $$ instead of $ it breaks down. Regards Haydar

…

On Tue, 11 Jun 2024 at 18:57, George ***@***.***> wrote: Also pasting it here so it is easier to copy: % This algorithm checks the axioms of probability for an AI image classification model\begin{algorithm}\caption{Check Probabilities of Image Classification Model}\begin{algorithmic}\PROCEDURE{CheckProbabilities}{$sample\_space, event\_A, event\_B$} \STATE $total\_images \gets$ \CALL{Length}{$sample\_space$} \STATE $prob\_A \gets$ \CALL{Length}{$event\_A$} / $total\_images$ \STATE $prob\_B \gets$ \CALL{Length}{$event\_B$} / $total\_images$ \PROCEDURE{NonNegativity}{$prob$} \IF{$prob \geq 0$} \STATE \textbf{return} True \ELSE \STATE \textbf{return} False \ENDIF \ENDPROCEDURE \PROCEDURE{Normalisation}{$prob\_A, prob\_B$} \IF{$prob\_A + prob\_B = 1$} \STATE \textbf{return} True \ELSE \STATE \textbf{return} False \ENDIF \ENDPROCEDURE \PROCEDURE{Additivity}{$prob\_A, prob\_B$} \IF{$prob\_A + prob\_B \leq 1$} \STATE \textbf{return} True \ELSE \STATE \textbf{return} False \ENDIF \ENDPROCEDURE \STATE $is\_non\_negative \gets$ \CALL{NonNegativity}{$prob\_A$} \AND \CALL{NonNegativity}{$prob\_B$} \STATE $is\_normalised \gets$ \CALL{Normalisation}{$prob\_A, prob\_B$} \STATE $is\_additive \gets$ \CALL{Additivity}{$prob\_A, prob\_B$} \IF{$is\_non\_negative$} \STATE \textbf{print}("Non-negativity check passed") \ELSE \STATE \textbf{print}("Non-negativity check failed") \ENDIF \IF{$is\_normalised$} \STATE \textbf{print}("Normalisation check passed") \ELSE \STATE \textbf{print}("Normalisation check failed") \ENDIF \IF{$is\_additive$} \STATE \textbf{print}("Additivity check passed") \ELSE \STATE \textbf{print}("Additivity check failed") \ENDIF \STATE \textbf{print}("Probability of image being a cat: ", $prob\_A$) \STATE \textbf{print}("Probability of image being a dog: ", $prob\_B$) \ENDPROCEDURE\end{algorithmic}\end{algorithm} — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#2460 (reply in thread)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AETEP7NQQTVKNZO5FLKSJP3ZG427XAVCNFSM6AAAAABINQ4GG6VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43SRDJONRXK43TNFXW4Q3PNVWWK3TUHM4TONBSGE4TG> . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[george-gca]

Yes, I know. But since they created the package, they might have an idea of what to do about it. Also we are using MathJax 3, which uses $$ instead of $, as can be seen in its docs, and what I did was just use the setup recommended in pseudocode documentation to integrate it.

[HaydarJawad]

Got it, will release an issue there Thank you

…

On Tue, 11 Jun 2024 at 22:11, George ***@***.***> wrote: Yes, I know. But since they created the package, they might have an idea of what to do about it. Also we are using MathJax 3, which uses $$ instead of $, as can be seen in its docs <https://docs.mathjax.org/en/latest/basic/mathematics.html#tex-and-latex-input>, and what I did was just use the setup recommended in pseudocode documentation <https://github.com/SaswatPadhi/pseudocode.js?tab=readme-ov-file#step-1c--for-mathjax-3x-users> to integrate it. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#2460 (reply in thread)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AETEP7JT6CZ7V4Y7XN7HKCLZG5RWTAVCNFSM6AAAAABINQ4GG6VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43SRDJONRXK43TNFXW4Q3PNVWWK3TUHM4TONBTG44TK> . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>