Deleting branches after merge #40
Closed
DavidBiddle
started this conversation in
Polls
Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
💯 agree, as a dev I dont want to have to remember to manually clear up branches after myself. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
I think if nobody objects today, I'll do this tomorrow morning pre-standup |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Should we turn on automatic deletion of feature branches after pull requests are merged? We're generally doing this manually after every PR anyway, so it might make sense to automate it.
Branches in Git are cheap, so it doesn't hugely matter if they aren't deleted, but it's tidier if we delete them - e.g. if we look at Github's branch view for the admin we can see there are more merged branches still hanging around than there are active branches. It's easy to recreate a branch once it's been deleted, so there's no real downside to doing this.
2 votes ·
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions