You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thank you for creating an awesome package. I was optimizing my workflow using this package and noticed in our spatial data that only has 1k targets we were throwing out most of the gene sets from our gmt. Digging into your code, I noticed that these gene sets are removed after calculating the AUC.
I added a preemptive filtering step to our gmt that mimics your default filtering and was able to cut hours off our pathway step. I know this was built for full transcriptome scRNA-seq data and not 1k targets so you wouldn't have expected this level of filtering but is there a reason for filtering after doing the calculations and not before the bulk of the function?
Thanks,
Maddy
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi,
Thank you for creating an awesome package. I was optimizing my workflow using this package and noticed in our spatial data that only has 1k targets we were throwing out most of the gene sets from our gmt. Digging into your code, I noticed that these gene sets are removed after calculating the AUC.
I added a preemptive filtering step to our gmt that mimics your default filtering and was able to cut hours off our pathway step. I know this was built for full transcriptome scRNA-seq data and not 1k targets so you wouldn't have expected this level of filtering but is there a reason for filtering after doing the calculations and not before the bulk of the function?
Thanks,
Maddy
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: