You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We will be using regular falsi combined with newton raphson and bisection method to find the root .It is beneficial in two ways as
1.It can be used to test/verify the roots obtained by step by step solver
2. It can be used to find the roots of transcendental equation
Example:
find_root(expression,lower bound,upper bound,decimal place precission)
find_root(cos(x)-x*e^x,0,1,4)
Answer=0.5177
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I have already started some work on this and trying to make it more fail-safe and efficient,
I will be sharing my work with you after my semester exams are over(i am into my exams).
it seems simple but NR algorithm could fail at times which should be handled by other algorithms ( bisection or regular falsi which can yet fail at other cases)
and they have a different asymptotic rate of convergence
Actually I have been working on this already. Lets's work together on this then. I think Newton Raphson alone won't be able to do the job of finding roots.
We will be using regular falsi combined with newton raphson and bisection method to find the root .It is beneficial in two ways as
1.It can be used to test/verify the roots obtained by step by step solver
2. It can be used to find the roots of transcendental equation
Example:
find_root(expression,lower bound,upper bound,decimal place precission)
find_root(cos(x)-x*e^x,0,1,4)
Answer=0.5177
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: