Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[glyphsetProof] reliance on f.glyphOrder may lead to missing glyphs #12

Open
frankrolf opened this issue May 6, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
Assignees

Comments

@frankrolf
Copy link
Member

f.glyphOrder is not required to contain all glyphs in the UFO, so we may end up missing some in the proof (to-do)

@frankrolf frankrolf self-assigned this May 6, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant