Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

remove "submodelElements" from SubmodelValue #253

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: IDTA-01002-3-1_preparation
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

sebbader-sap
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@sebbader-sap sebbader-sap added this to the 3.1 milestone Mar 4, 2024
ValueOnly:
description: "The ValueOnly serialization of submodel elements (patternProperties and propertyNames will be supported propably with OpenApi 3.1). The full description of the generic JSON validation schema for the ValueOnly-serialization can be found in chapter 11.4.3 in Details of the Asset Administration Shell Part 2.\n"
description: "The ValueOnly serialization (patternProperties and propertyNames will be supported probably with OpenApi 3.1). The full description of the generic JSON validation schema for the ValueOnly-serialization can be found in chapter 11.4 in 'Specification of the Asset Administration Shell - Part 2'."
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
description: "The ValueOnly serialization (patternProperties and propertyNames will be supported probably with OpenApi 3.1). The full description of the generic JSON validation schema for the ValueOnly-serialization can be found in chapter 11.4 in 'Specification of the Asset Administration Shell - Part 2'."
description: "The ValueOnly serialization (patternProperties and propertyNames will probably be supported with OpenApi 3.1). The full description of the generic JSON Schema for the ValueOnly-serialization can be found 'IDTA-01001 Specification of the Asset Administration Shell - Part 1'."

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants