Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: /update-vrt on forks #3773

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 4, 2024
Merged

Conversation

UnderKoen
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@actual-github-bot actual-github-bot bot changed the title fix: /update-vrt on forks [WIP] fix: /update-vrt on forks Nov 3, 2024
Copy link

netlify bot commented Nov 3, 2024

Deploy Preview for actualbudget ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 4ba07bf
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/actualbudget/deploys/67281b287324a4000824bc9d
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-3773.demo.actualbudget.org
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@UnderKoen UnderKoen changed the title [WIP] fix: /update-vrt on forks fix: /update-vrt on forks Nov 3, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 3, 2024

Bundle Stats — desktop-client

Hey there, this message comes from a GitHub action that helps you and reviewers to understand how these changes affect the size of this project's bundle.

As this PR is updated, I'll keep you updated on how the bundle size is impacted.

Total

Files count Total bundle size % Changed
10 5.34 MB 0%

Changeset

No files were changed

View detailed bundle breakdown

Added

No assets were added

Removed

No assets were removed

Bigger

No assets were bigger

Smaller

No assets were smaller

Unchanged

Asset File Size % Changed
static/js/workbox-window.prod.es5.js 5.69 kB 0%
static/js/resize-observer.js 18.37 kB 0%
static/js/indexeddb-main-thread-worker-e59fee74.js 13.5 kB 0%
static/js/BackgroundImage.js 122.29 kB 0%
static/js/AppliedFilters.js 21.3 kB 0%
static/js/usePreviewTransactions.js 1.64 kB 0%
static/js/narrow.js 82.57 kB 0%
static/js/wide.js 238.83 kB 0%
static/js/ReportRouter.js 1.5 MB 0%
static/js/index.js 3.34 MB 0%

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 3, 2024

Bundle Stats — loot-core

Hey there, this message comes from a GitHub action that helps you and reviewers to understand how these changes affect the size of this project's bundle.

As this PR is updated, I'll keep you updated on how the bundle size is impacted.

Total

Files count Total bundle size % Changed
1 1.27 MB 0%

Changeset

No files were changed

View detailed bundle breakdown

Added

No assets were added

Removed

No assets were removed

Bigger

No assets were bigger

Smaller

No assets were smaller

Unchanged

Asset File Size % Changed
kcab.worker.js 1.27 MB 0%

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 3, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the GitHub Actions workflow for Visual Regression Testing (VRT) by updating the configuration in the .github/workflows/update-vrt.yml file. Key changes include the addition of a container directive that specifies the use of the Playwright Docker image mcr.microsoft.com/playwright:v1.41.1-jammy. The uses directive has been changed from xt0rted/pull-request-comment-branch@v2 to a forked version gotson/pull-request-comment-branch@head-repo-owner-dist, noted as a temporary measure until a related issue is resolved. Furthermore, the checkout step has been updated to dynamically reference the repository using outputs from a previous step, allowing the workflow to check out the appropriate branch from the pull request. The repository input now utilizes ${{ steps.comment-branch.outputs.head_owner }}/${{ steps.comment-branch.outputs.head_repo }}. The overall workflow sequence remains largely unchanged, continuing to set up the environment, wait for the Netlify build, run VRT tests, and commit any updates to snapshot images.

Possibly related PRs

  • ci: /update-vrt #3764: The changes in this PR involve modifications to the same workflow file (update-vrt.yml) and relate to the automation of Visual Regression Testing, making it directly relevant to the main PR's updates in the same file.

Suggested labels

:sparkles: Merged

Suggested reviewers

  • jfdoming
  • matt-fidd

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

matt-fidd
matt-fidd previously approved these changes Nov 3, 2024
@joel-jeremy
Copy link
Contributor

joel-jeremy commented Nov 3, 2024

I tried on one of the PRs and am getting this error:
image

https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/actions/runs/11655324670

@matt-fidd
Copy link
Contributor

I tried on one of the PRs and am getting this error: image

https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/actions/runs/11655324670

I believe this has been fixed here in ff6100c

@UnderKoen UnderKoen merged commit 83ceea4 into actualbudget:master Nov 4, 2024
19 of 20 checks passed
@UnderKoen UnderKoen deleted the ci/update-vrt branch November 4, 2024 16:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants