Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Bug]: net worth report date-ranges #3373

Closed
2 tasks done
MatissJanis opened this issue Sep 5, 2024 · 2 comments · Fixed by #3379
Closed
2 tasks done

[Bug]: net worth report date-ranges #3373

MatissJanis opened this issue Sep 5, 2024 · 2 comments · Fixed by #3379
Labels
bug Something isn't working regression This bug appeared after a recent release and needs to be fixed before the next release reports Related to reports

Comments

@MatissJanis
Copy link
Member

Verified issue does not already exist?

  • I have searched and found no existing issue
  • I will be providing steps how to reproduce the bug (in most cases this will also mean uploading a demo budget file)

What happened?

sfdafda

Where are you hosting Actual?

None

What browsers are you seeing the problem on?

No response

Operating System

None

@MatissJanis MatissJanis added bug Something isn't working reports Related to reports regression This bug appeared after a recent release and needs to be fixed before the next release labels Sep 5, 2024
@MatissJanis
Copy link
Member Author

cc @carkom I tracked this down to validateStart somehow returning an unexpected date value. Maybe you have any quick ideas how we could patch it?

@carkom
Copy link
Contributor

carkom commented Sep 6, 2024

fixed by #3379

@youngcw youngcw linked a pull request Sep 6, 2024 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working regression This bug appeared after a recent release and needs to be fixed before the next release reports Related to reports
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants