-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Feedback] Release Report Budget #2999
Comments
To the last optional point on naming, not too fussed, but Traditional doesn't quite seen right, since while kinda true, it's also less descriptive and is suggestive it should be preferred. Could be 'Tracking' and 'Envelope'? I also think the envelope should have (Default) or (Recommended) beside it when selecting type in keeping with Actual's history and being the primary budget type. It's also what actual is most known for (a YNAB alternate). |
Not sure if Budget types are meant to be interlinked, I've always used them as complementary to each other. But if yes, I would suggest looking into #732. Maybe a dropdown menu of the Report budget could be extended with "Synchronize budgets" button? |
TBH I think we shouldn't do this. We should be removing steps from the onboarding flow, not adding more. |
I'm not sure dropping the rollover capability is a good idea. I am not sure how other people are using this, but that is still needed for me for a few categories (that typically have yearly or bi-yearly charges). Otherwise you really can't budget for those without some sort of rollover. |
FYI I started work on having hidden categories not affect this budget. I have two bugs I am tracking down and then I will probably PR that. |
I don't think a selector is needed, but I think people would like the option to set a name upon budget creation. If we do that, then its not a big deal to also add a type selector imo. |
Is budget name critical to get started? I would argue - no, it's optional. The onboarding should have as little friction as possible in order to allow new users to try out the product without needing to fill out forms and/or make decisions that could be made at a later date. Just click "try now" -> import an existing budget -> boom, you're ready to try it out. Simple as that. |
The only reason I would like to drop the ability is that the math for the budget totals gets weird. So if that could be made less weird, or the docs updated to make understanding those numbers easier, that would be fine with me. |
Feedback: #3346 |
I was wondering the state of the "tracking budgeting" feature. Is it safe to start using it today, or should I expect significant changes to it (changes that could wipe all my data) and not bother using it yet? I know it's in the "experimental" settings section, but I don't see any huge complaints from folks other than naming and some slight confusion on some of the displayed information. Thanks. Edit: I don't use Discord (and don't plan on it), so apologies for bringing discussion-type questions here, rather than feedback. |
@57194 I have been using it for a year and it is quite stable. You shouldn't lose data. I would say it is pretty close to moving out of experimental. I personally would like to see hidden categories not affect the tracking budget, but other than that I see no problems with it in its current form. |
Thanks for the quick answer, @psybers! That seems to answer what I was wondering. If it was still very early stages with sweeping changes planned, then I wasn't gonna bother using Actual yet; but if the core stuff is worked out and there shouldn't be any data-destroying changes, then I'll probably finally give Actual an honest try! :-) |
Hey everyone, I have a suggestion/request for this item:
I understand if this adds too much complexity, but would it be feasible to have a separate "don't count this" tag for a category rather than not counting every hidden category? That would solve a couple issues with the way I'd like to use tracking budgeting.
Thanks for your consideration. As an aside, I've very excited to switch to this budget type - I've essentially been using Actual in this way for a couple years by using a "Projected Income" budget line with negative amounts budgeted for future months, but it has been a bit clunky at times. |
I wonder what the purpose of 'hidden' categories is for an envelope budget? Is that really just acting more like an 'archived' category? Maybe that feature should be renamed to 'archived'? And then for tracking budgets, a new feature added called 'hidden' that hides it from the budget (but it is not archived/hidden in the UI)? |
I really prefer this budget type so 🥇 For hidden transactions, I just use this as a way to archive no longer relevant budgets. Such as if I need to budget for some specific thing, I can just hide that budget when it's over. For rolled over budgets, this is useful for tracking spend that's going to be repaid- like work budgets or healthcare cash plans. |
I think calling the new tag "Tracked" or something similar would make more sense. To me, "Hidden" implies visually hidden and I'd be confused if I clicked a "Hide" button and only a total at the top of the page changed. Could have the category dropdown show "Rename / (Hide | Show or Archive | Unarchive(?)) / (Untrack | Track) / Delete" |
Has anyone had issues with this budget not filling in budgeted amounts? It seems fine if everything stays local, but doesn't seem to sync between devices properly and amounts also don't show after an export/import. I tried digging through the code a bit last night, but I'm not at all familiar with react or the sheets/query/caching system going on so I didn't make much progress. |
@joel-rich Does it still do it if you test on edge.actualbudget.org? |
@youngcw That build seems fine. Old exports still have nothing filled, but it's good if I fill the budget on edge and export then import again. Edge is latest daily master so it'll be good next release? |
Yes, everything in current edge will be in the next release. |
@MatissJanis I did the needed updates to the docs page. So this is minimally ready for release. |
What's the proper way to plan a budget for N months ahead with tracked option? Although I can plan each month's expenses and incomes separately, I can't find a way to link the results of previous and next months together. Say, I'm planning my next year's budget and start with 0€ in my account on January 1st. My "projected savings" in January are 1000€, so I expect to have 1000€ in my account on January 31st. P.S. The envelope option doesn't work for me, since there's no way to plan my budget for next N months if I'm not able to budget in my income as well. |
Report (tracking) budget will be released as a first party feature in v24.12.0. If there are any further feedback items and/or bug reports - please open individual issues. Thanks to everyone that collaborated on this! |
The Report Budget option needs just a few things before it can be released fully.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: