Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature] Filtering payees that have no rules #2291

Closed
1 of 2 tasks
psybers opened this issue Jan 27, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed
1 of 2 tasks

[Feature] Filtering payees that have no rules #2291

psybers opened this issue Jan 27, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
feature This issue is a feature request needs votes Please upvote this feature request if you would like to see it implemented!

Comments

@psybers
Copy link
Contributor

psybers commented Jan 27, 2024

Verified feature request does not already exist?

  • I have searched and found no existing issue

💻

  • Would you like to implement this feature?

Pitch: what problem are you trying to solve?

Especially for new users that have imported a lot of past history, it takes quite awhile to build up a good set of rules for categorizing payees. As you add more and more rules, when you have hundreds of existing payees, it can be difficult to see what payees still need a rule added.

Describe your ideal solution to this problem

You can currently filter payees by typing in a string. I propose another way to filter: by those payees with or without rules. Then you can filter down to just your payees that have no rules yet and focus on adding rules for those.

This could be done via the UI (a button, checkbox, etc.) or by adding a filter string such as "has:rule". The second approach could be combined with the existing filter, so you could search for things like "has:rule amaz" to get all payees that match "amaz" that also have a rule. And then there would be need for negating it somehow, such as "not has:rule". This syntax is inspired by the search capabilities of GMail.

Or you can combine the two approaches: have the filter implemented via the search string, but then have a button (or two) that automatically populates the search field with "not has:rule" when clicked.

Teaching and learning

If it is a UI element, it probably is easily discoverable. If it is a search string, you will need to update the documentation to document the query syntax. You might want to provide a hint under the filter box that they can search for "not has:rule" etc. If you use the combined approach, it probably self-documents.

@psybers psybers added the feature This issue is a feature request label Jan 27, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added the needs votes Please upvote this feature request if you would like to see it implemented! label Jan 27, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

✨ Thanks for sharing your idea! ✨

This repository uses lodash style issue management for enhancements. That means enhancement issues are automatically closed. This doesn’t mean we don’t accept feature requests, though! We will consider implementing ones that receive many upvotes, and we welcome contributions for any feature requests marked as needing votes (just post a comment first so we can help you make a successful contribution).

The enhancement backlog can be found here: https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/issues?q=label%3A%22needs+votes%22+sort%3Areactions-%2B1-desc+

Don’t forget to upvote the top comment with 👍!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature This issue is a feature request needs votes Please upvote this feature request if you would like to see it implemented!
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant