Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Bug]: Reconciled transactions should not be duplicated as such #2155

Closed
1 task done
tavlima opened this issue Jan 1, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed
1 task done

[Bug]: Reconciled transactions should not be duplicated as such #2155

tavlima opened this issue Jan 1, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working transaction reconciliation Related to transaction reconciliation

Comments

@tavlima
Copy link

tavlima commented Jan 1, 2024

Verified issue does not already exist?

  • I have searched and found no existing issue

What happened?

Given the reconciled state of a transactions cannot be removed (which I think should be possible, but that is another discussion), the resulting transaction from duplicating an existing reconciled transaction should NOT be automatically flagged as reconciled. IMHO, it should be uncleared, for consistency.

What error did you receive?

No response

Where are you hosting Actual?

Fly.io

What browsers are you seeing the problem on?

No response

Operating System

None

@tavlima tavlima added the bug Something isn't working label Jan 1, 2024
@MatissJanis
Copy link
Member

Locked transactions should in fact be unlock-able. Though nobody has built the feature yet :)

Would that solve your problem?

@MatissJanis
Copy link
Member

Unlocking should solve the problem. Closing this since there is no response from OP.

@MatissJanis MatissJanis closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Mar 21, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working transaction reconciliation Related to transaction reconciliation
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants