Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Flag/Tag Covenant/Transposition Items #214

Closed
malcalevak opened this issue Jun 4, 2018 · 3 comments
Closed

Flag/Tag Covenant/Transposition Items #214

malcalevak opened this issue Jun 4, 2018 · 3 comments

Comments

@malcalevak
Copy link

When you're trying to collect everything, it can be a bit of a hassle when you see an item, and aren't sure if you can farm it, it'd be much easier to skip over them if you could see on the list that it required soul transposition or covenant ranking.

@ZKjellberg
Copy link
Owner

I'm not sure I understand your request. Are you asking to add more details to the Equipment tab to explain the requirements for items?

@malcalevak
Copy link
Author

Apologies for not being more clear, but yes. I'm in the process of collecting all the equipment, and being able to "hide completed" is a big help, but when it comes to what's left, I've got maybe 80% items that I'll need to soul transpose after NG+, 10% I need to rank up in covenants, and 10% to farm. After clicking on them enough times, I've got a pretty good idea of which is which, now, but it would've saved me time if things said like the achievements, "Hollowslayer Greatsword: Obtained by Soul of the Rotted Greatwood", and similarly next to the covenant rewards. Thinking now, maybe this duplicates another ticket, but I'm mostly just concerned with being able to call out which are soul transposition and which are covenant related, since for farming I typically want to look at the association fextra page, given it often has tips on farming.
Just my 2-cents, though! This tool is awesome.

@ZKjellberg
Copy link
Owner

So you want something like Issue #117. If you want to try tackling this issue, I'd welcome a PR. I'm closing this issue and if you want to add further discussion, please add it to #117.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants