You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We are trying to tetrahedralize a parallelopiped, but find that the boundary triangles of the tetrahedralization are not exactly parallel to the input parallelopiped.
Is there a way to constrain TetWild to exactly preserve the input mesh (so that all vertices of the input mesh are present in the output; and also all Steiner points added on the boundary are exactly on an input face)?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Unfortunately not yet. We are working on an extension to support this, but it is a few months away. CGAL should be able to do exactly what you need, and you can try to call it from https://pymesh.readthedocs.io/en/latest/api_mesh_generation.html . @qnzhou wrote a nice wrapper for multiple tetrahedralization engines, and both CGAL and tetgen should be able to do this reliably if the boundary is a simple parallelopiped.
We are trying to tetrahedralize a parallelopiped, but find that the boundary triangles of the tetrahedralization are not exactly parallel to the input parallelopiped.
Is there a way to constrain TetWild to exactly preserve the input mesh (so that all vertices of the input mesh are present in the output; and also all Steiner points added on the boundary are exactly on an input face)?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: