From 7e693d2146c51ffb97b5aefbb090acb929737006 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: malcalakovalski Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2023 15:46:39 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] update --- _freeze/index/execute-results/html.json | 2 +- .../Redlininggrade_layer.fgb | Bin 139728 -> 139728 bytes 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/_freeze/index/execute-results/html.json b/_freeze/index/execute-results/html.json index 8aab28b..86b0fcc 100644 --- a/_freeze/index/execute-results/html.json +++ b/_freeze/index/execute-results/html.json @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ { "hash": "c6209d2f3525fa544ca5501c4170601a", "result": { - "markdown": "---\ntitle: \n \"![](www/images/act-logo.png){width=6in}\n
\n Rochester Region Federal Funds Dashboard\"\nsubtitle: \"How the Rochester Region Is Spending Federal Recovery Dollars\"\ndate: '08/22/23'\ndate-format: \"MMMM D, YYYY\"\nlanguage:\n title-block-published: \"Data as of\"\neditor_options: \n chunk_output_type: console\nexecute:\n echo: false\n message: false\n warning: false\n error: false\ncss: style.css\nknitr:\n opts_chunk: \n dev: \"ragg_png\"\n---\n\n::: {.cell layout-align=\"center\"}\n\n:::\n\n::: {.cell}\n\n:::\n\n::: {.cell}\n\n:::\n\n::: {.cell}\n\n:::\n\n::: {.cell}\n\n:::\n\n\nThe federal government provided unprecedented levels of flexible relief funds to\nlocal governments across the country, [including those in the Rochester\nregion](https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/105119/harnessing-federal-funds-for-inclusive-recovery-in-rochester-ny_0.pdf),\nto help them recover from the economic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. As the\nCity of Rochester and Monroe County continue to allocate and spend these federal\nrecovery funds, they have an unparalleled opportunity to not only stimulate\neconomic recovery from the pandemic, but to also increase equity and remediate\nsome of the past inequities that have been [built into our nation's\nlaws](https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=SdtDDQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT4&dq=color+of+law&ots=RL_u4QqRBH&sig=eYYnHvwibwB_XBfpzr0jQVK2SOs#v=onepage&q=color%20of%20law&f=false)\nand programs. To do so, the funds [must be\nused](https://www.urban.org/research/publication/inclusive-recovery-us-cities)\nto ensure that everyone--especially historically excluded groups--can benefit\nfrom and contribute to economic growth.\n\nTo increase transparency in this process, this dashboard tracks data on how the\nCity of Rochester and Monroe County have allocated and spent a portion of these\nrecovery funds: [State and Local Fiscal Recovery\nFunds](https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/coronavirus/assistance-for-state-local-and-tribal-governments/state-and-local-fiscal-recovery-funds#:~:text=The%20Coronavirus%20State%20and%20Local,COVID%2D19%20public%20health%20emergency)\n(SLFRF) provided through the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA). SLFRF must be\nobligated by the end of 2024 and spent by the end of 2026. The dashboard focuses\non SLFRF because of their flexibility in giving local governments authority to\ndecide how they should be spent. And, they tended to be on longer term recovery\nefforts rather than on short term emergency public health response, which was\nthe focus of Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act)\ndollars.\n\nThe dashboard starts by showing what percent of the allocations align with the\nbuilding blocks of an inclusive recovery, which are five strategies for spending\nthat direct funds to support equity and inclusion. These five building blocks\nare: create jobs for those who face the greatest barriers to employment, connect\nhistorically excluded residents to jobs and economic opportunities, reinvest in\ndisinvested communities, stabilize housing and expand affordable housing, and\ncreate opportunities for low-wealth households to build wealth. As of\n08/22/23, 65% of the dollars in the City of Rochester and Monroe\nCounty were allocated toward programs and initiatives that align with these\nbuilding blocks.\n\nThe dashboard then shows more broadly how funds are being spent by policy area\nand subtopic. Next, it explores how well the allocations align with Rochester\nArea Community Foundation's priorities. Finally, it shows how the City of\nRochester's SLFRF capital investments map onto racial characteristics of\nneighborhoods within the region, as well as how they overlap with the original\nredlining maps for the city. (Redlining refers to the process in which borrowers\nare denied access to credit due to the racial composition of their\nneighborhood.) At the end of the dashboard is a table showing all of the\nallocations and their descriptions in detail.\n\nNote that this dashboard does not track outcomes from these investments -- it\nonly shows where the dollars are flowing. Simply allocating funds toward topics\nthat could increase equity and inclusion does not guarantee that they do so.\nFuture research efforts should closely monitor outcomes and impacts from the\nrecovery dollar investments to ensure that they close equity gaps exacerbated by\nthe pandemic and address the root causes of inequities.\n\n## How Much is Being Spent on an Inclusive Recovery?\n\n[Previous work by the Urban\nInstitute](https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/105290/aligning-the-use-of-recovery-funds-with-community-goals-in-rochester-new-york.pdf)\nidentified five building blocks of an inclusive recovery. These building blocks\nwere created in collaboration with community stakeholders across the country and\ninclude:\n\n1. **Create jobs** for residents hardest hit by the pandemic or who face the\n greatest barriers to employment\n2. **Connect residents to jobs** and economic opportunities, including through\n workforce development, child care, transportation, or broadband\n3. **Reinvest in disinvested communities** and address long-standing\n disparities in access to education, capital, economic opportunities, and\n climate resilience\n4. **Stabilize housing and expand affordable housing** options for low-income\n households and housing-insecure renters\n5. Create opportunities for low-wealth households to **build wealth**.\n\nAcross all allocations for the city and county, **65%** of the funding has\nbeen allocated towards these strategies that promote inclusive recovery and\nequitable growth. The figure below shows the total amount of funding for\nRochester and Monroe County that was allocated to programs that align with these\nbuilding blocks, based on review of the program description and goals.\n\n\n::: {.cell}\n::: {.cell-output-display}\n![](index_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-4-1.png){width=672}\n:::\n:::\n\n\n## What types of inclusive recovery strategies are supported?\n\nOut of the funds allocated to programs that align with the five building blocks\nof an inclusive recovery, the most funding has been allocated to reinvesting in\ndisinvested communities, while the least has been allocated to creating jobs for\nresidents hardest hit by the pandemic or who face the greatest barriers to\nemployment. The figure below shows how that funding is divided among the five\nbuilding blocks and includes only the funds allocated to programs that align\nwith the building blocks.\n\n\n::: {.cell}\n::: {.cell-output-display}\n![Source: Urban Institute calculations of data from City of Rochester ARPA Reporting Dashboard and Monroe County Recovery Plan 2023 Annual Report](index_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-5-1.png){width=672}\n:::\n:::\n\n\n## What policy areas are being funded?\n\n\n::: {.cell}\n\n:::\n\n::: {.cell}\n \n \nThe City of Rochester and Monroe County have allocated almost **$301M** of SLFRF funds, and, of those, **14.6%** have been reported as spent. The figure below shows how that funding has been allocated across policy categories and includes all allocations, not just those that align with the building blocks of an inclusive recovery. \n \nBy category, most of the funds have been allocated to Community and Economic Development, Infrastructure, and Housing, while the least have been allocated to Operations, Public Health and COVID-19 Response, and Social Services. \n:::\n\n\n::: panel-tabset\n## Allocated\n\n\n::: {.cell}\n::: {.cell-output-display}\n![Source: Urban Institute calculations of data from City of Rochester ARPA Reporting Dashboard and Monroe County Recovery Plan 2023 Annual Report](index_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-8-1.png){width=672}\n:::\n:::\n\n\n## Spent\n\n\n::: {.cell}\n::: {.cell-output-display}\n![Source: Urban Institute calculations of data from City of Rochester ARPA Reporting Dashboard and Monroe County Recovery Plan 2023 Annual Report](index_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-9-1.png){width=672}\n:::\n:::\n\n:::\n\n## What subtopics are funded within each policy area?\n\nThe figure below provides a more detailed breakdown of allocations to each\npolicy area. Each policy area tab breaks down the allocations into subtopics.\nFor example, most of the money allocated to community and economic development\nhas gone to workforce development.\n\n::: panel-tabset\n### Community and Economic Development\n\n\n::: {.cell}\n::: {.cell-output-display}\n![Source: Urban Institute calculations of data from City of Rochester ARPA Reporting Dashboard and Monroe County Recovery Plan 2023 Annual Report](index_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-10-1.png){width=672}\n:::\n:::\n\n\n### Infrastructure\n\n\n::: {.cell}\n::: {.cell-output-display}\n![Source: Urban Institute calculations of data from City of Rochester ARPA Reporting Dashboard and Monroe County Recovery Plan 2023 Annual Report](index_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-11-1.png){width=672}\n:::\n:::\n\n\n### Housing\n\n\n::: {.cell}\n::: {.cell-output-display}\n![Source: Urban Institute calculations of data from City of Rochester ARPA Reporting Dashboard and Monroe County Recovery Plan 2023 Annual Report](index_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-12-1.png){width=672}\n:::\n:::\n\n\n### Public Safety\n\n\n::: {.cell}\n::: {.cell-output-display}\n![Source: Urban Institute calculations of data from City of Rochester ARPA Reporting Dashboard and Monroe County Recovery Plan 2023 Annual Report](index_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-13-1.png){width=672}\n:::\n:::\n\n\n### Social Services\n\n\n::: {.cell}\n::: {.cell-output-display}\n![Source: Urban Institute calculations of data from City of Rochester ARPA Reporting Dashboard and Monroe County Recovery Plan 2023 Annual Report](index_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-14-1.png){width=672}\n:::\n:::\n\n\n### Public Health\n\n\n::: {.cell}\n::: {.cell-output-display}\n![Source: Urban Institute calculations of data from City of Rochester ARPA Reporting Dashboard and Monroe County Recovery Plan 2023 Annual Report](index_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-15-1.png){width=672}\n:::\n:::\n\n\n### Operations\n\n\n::: {.cell}\n::: {.cell-output-display}\n![Source: Urban Institute calculations of data from City of Rochester ARPA Reporting Dashboard and Monroe County Recovery Plan 2023 Annual Report](index_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-16-1.png){width=672}\n:::\n:::\n\n:::\n\n## How does funding align with the Rochester Area Community Foundation's priorities?\n\n\n::: {.cell}\n\n:::\n\n\nThe Rochester Area Community Foundation's key priorities for investment in the\nregion include:\n\n- Closing the academic achievement and opportunity gap;\n\n- Fostering racial and ethnic understanding and equity;\n\n- Partnering against poverty;\n\n- Supporting arts and culture; Preserving historic assets;\n\n- Advancing environmental justice and sustainability; and\n\n- Promoting successful aging.\n\n\n::: {.cell}\n\nOverall, **61.1%** of SLFRF funding has been allocated towards these priority areas. The figure below shows how SLFRF funding is divided among the priority topics and includes only the funds allocated to programs that align with one of RACF's priority areas.\n:::\n\n::: {.cell}\n::: {.cell-output-display}\n![Source: Urban Institute calculations of data from City of Rochester ARPA Reporting Dashboard and Monroe County Recovery Plan 2023 Annual Report](index_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-18-1.png){width=672}\n:::\n:::\n\n\n## Which neighborhoods are the funds being spent in?\n\nThe map below shows how the City of Rochester's SLFRF capital investments map\nonto racial characteristics of neighborhoods, as well as the original Federal\nredlining maps for the city. Click on the tabs at the top to see how they\noverlap with the percent of residents who are Black in a neighborhood and the\npercent of residents who are Hispanic/Latino[^1].\n\n[^1]: We use the term \"Hispanic/Latino\" in this map because this is the term\n used in the data collected by the American Community Survey. We recognize\n that this may not be the preferred identifier for all, and we remain\n committed to employing inclusive language whenever possible. \n\n[Redlining](https://www.npr.org/2017/05/03/526655831/a-forgotten-history-of-how-the-u-s-government-segregated-america)\nrefers to the system that the Federal Housing Administration and the Home\nOwners' Loan Corporation used to grade the profitability of neighborhoods in the\nlate 1930s. The four categories were green (\"best\"), blue (\"still desirable\"),\nyellow (\"definitely declining\"), and red (\"hazardous\"). These grades were\nlargely based on the neighborhood's racial, ethnic, socioeconomic, and religious\ncomposition. Generally, White, middle-class neighborhoods received FHA home\nloans, whereas many Black and Hispanic/Latino neighborhoods were deemed\nhazardous and declining in value and did not receive FHA insured mortgages or\nloans. These maps [had long lasting\neffects](https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/200568/1/1010730592.pdf) on\nracial segregation, homeownership, and house values in redlined neighborhoods.\n\nTo increase equity in the region, leaders must overinvest in communities that\nhave been underinvested in historically. These investments must be those that\n[benefit incumbent\nresidents](https://www.urban.org/research/publication/what-policies-and-programs-can-support-inclusive-recovery-rochester-new-york),\nmeaning that they should not be investments that only benefit new, incoming\nwealthier residents, or those that have negative impacts on immediate neighbors,\nlike a sewage treatment facility or a highway that pollutes the air. And, they\nmust be investments that [community members\nwant](https://www.urban.org/research/publication/aligning-use-recovery-funds-community-goals-rochester-new-york),\nparticularly historically excluded members. The maps below give us a first\napproximation of how equitably investments are distributed, but further\nexploration of how these investments align with the goals of community members\nand how much they benefit historically excluded residents is necessary to ensure\nthat they are increasing equity within those communities. \n\n::: panel-tabset\n\n::: {.cell}\n\n:::\n\n::: {.cell}\n\n:::\n\n::: {.cell}\n\n:::\n\n\n\n### Redlining\n\n\n::: {.cell}\n::: {.cell-output-display}\n```{=html}\n
\n\n```\n:::\n:::\n\n::: {.cell}\n\n:::\n\n\n### Percent Black\n\n\n::: {.cell}\n::: {.cell-output-display}\n```{=html}\n
\n\n```\n:::\n:::\n\n\n### Percent Hispanic/Latino\n\n\n\n::: {.cell}\n::: {.cell-output-display}\n```{=html}\n
\n\n```\n:::\n:::\n\n:::\n\n
\n\n## Explore All Programs Funded {#programs-table}\n\nThis table shows all programs that the City of Rochester and Monroe County have\nallocated SLFRF funds to, as well as their building block, policy area, policy\nsubtopic, and RACF priority area category. The default display on the table\nshows the programs in order from largest to smallest allocation. You can use the\narrows next to each column title to sort the table by that column, and you can\nuse the search bars under each column or the overall search bar to search the\ntable. \n\nNote: Data on spending were only available from the City of Rochester \n\nData current as of: 08/22/23\n\n\n::: {.cell}\n::: {.cell-output-display}\n```{=html}\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n```\n:::\n:::\n\n\n
\n\n## About the Dashboard\n\nThis dashboard was created by the [Urban Institute](https://www.urban.org/) in\npartnership with and support from [The Rochester Area Community Foundation\n(RACF)](https://www.racf.org/) to visualize Monroe County and the City of\nRochester's ARPA spending by the five building blocks of inclusive recovery,\npolicy category, and RACF's investment priorities. By tracking recovery funding\nexpenditures, this dashboard allows us to monitor public spending by the\ncategories most critical in supporting an inclusive recovery from the COVID-19\npandemic.\n\n\n::: {.cell}\n::: {.cell-output-display}\n```{=html}\n\n\n\n```\n:::\n:::\n\n\n
\n\nFor more information about the dashboard, please contact [Meg\nNorris](mailto:mnorris@racf.org) (The Rochester Area community Foundation) or\n[Christina Stacy](mailto:cstacy@urban.org) (Urban Institute).\n\nClick For [Glossary of Terms](glossary.qmd)\n\nThe code used to create this dashboard was writen by [Manuel Alcalá\nKovalski](mailto:malcalakovalski@urban.org) and can be found on\n[GitHub](https://github.com/UI-Research/rochester-dashboard).\n", + "markdown": "---\ntitle: \n \"![](www/images/act-logo.png){width=6in}\n
\n Rochester Region Federal Funds Dashboard\"\nsubtitle: \"How the Rochester Region Is Spending Federal Recovery Dollars\"\ndate: '08/22/23'\ndate-format: \"MMMM D, YYYY\"\nlanguage:\n title-block-published: \"Data as of\"\neditor_options: \n chunk_output_type: console\nexecute:\n echo: false\n message: false\n warning: false\n error: false\ncss: style.css\nknitr:\n opts_chunk: \n dev: \"ragg_png\"\n---\n\n::: {.cell layout-align=\"center\"}\n\n:::\n\n::: {.cell}\n\n:::\n\n::: {.cell}\n\n:::\n\n::: {.cell}\n\n:::\n\n::: {.cell}\n\n:::\n\n\nThe federal government provided unprecedented levels of flexible relief funds to\nlocal governments across the country, [including those in the Rochester\nregion](https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/105119/harnessing-federal-funds-for-inclusive-recovery-in-rochester-ny_0.pdf),\nto help them recover from the economic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. As the\nCity of Rochester and Monroe County continue to allocate and spend these federal\nrecovery funds, they have an unparalleled opportunity to not only stimulate\neconomic recovery from the pandemic, but to also increase equity and remediate\nsome of the past inequities that have been [built into our nation's\nlaws](https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=SdtDDQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT4&dq=color+of+law&ots=RL_u4QqRBH&sig=eYYnHvwibwB_XBfpzr0jQVK2SOs#v=onepage&q=color%20of%20law&f=false)\nand programs. To do so, the funds [must be\nused](https://www.urban.org/research/publication/inclusive-recovery-us-cities)\nto ensure that everyone--especially historically excluded groups--can benefit\nfrom and contribute to economic growth.\n\nTo increase transparency in this process, this dashboard tracks data on how the\nCity of Rochester and Monroe County have allocated and spent a portion of these\nrecovery funds: [State and Local Fiscal Recovery\nFunds](https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/coronavirus/assistance-for-state-local-and-tribal-governments/state-and-local-fiscal-recovery-funds#:~:text=The%20Coronavirus%20State%20and%20Local,COVID%2D19%20public%20health%20emergency)\n(SLFRF) provided through the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA). SLFRF must be\nobligated by the end of 2024 and spent by the end of 2026. The dashboard focuses\non SLFRF because of their flexibility in giving local governments authority to\ndecide how they should be spent. And, they tended to be on longer term recovery\nefforts rather than on short term emergency public health response, which was\nthe focus of Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act)\ndollars.\n\nThe dashboard starts by showing what percent of the allocations align with the\nbuilding blocks of an inclusive recovery, which are five strategies for spending\nthat direct funds to support equity and inclusion. These five building blocks\nare: create jobs for those who face the greatest barriers to employment, connect\nhistorically excluded residents to jobs and economic opportunities, reinvest in\ndisinvested communities, stabilize housing and expand affordable housing, and\ncreate opportunities for low-wealth households to build wealth. As of\n08/22/23, 65% of the dollars in the City of Rochester and Monroe\nCounty were allocated toward programs and initiatives that align with these\nbuilding blocks.\n\nThe dashboard then shows more broadly how funds are being spent by policy area\nand subtopic. Next, it explores how well the allocations align with Rochester\nArea Community Foundation's priorities. Finally, it shows how the City of\nRochester's SLFRF capital investments map onto racial characteristics of\nneighborhoods within the region, as well as how they overlap with the original\nredlining maps for the city. (Redlining refers to the process in which borrowers\nare denied access to credit due to the racial composition of their\nneighborhood.) At the end of the dashboard is a table showing all of the\nallocations and their descriptions in detail.\n\nNote that this dashboard does not track outcomes from these investments -- it\nonly shows where the dollars are flowing. Simply allocating funds toward topics\nthat could increase equity and inclusion does not guarantee that they do so.\nFuture research efforts should closely monitor outcomes and impacts from the\nrecovery dollar investments to ensure that they close equity gaps exacerbated by\nthe pandemic and address the root causes of inequities.\n\n## How Much is Being Spent on an Inclusive Recovery?\n\n[Previous work by the Urban\nInstitute](https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/105290/aligning-the-use-of-recovery-funds-with-community-goals-in-rochester-new-york.pdf)\nidentified five building blocks of an inclusive recovery. These building blocks\nwere created in collaboration with community stakeholders across the country and\ninclude:\n\n1. **Create jobs** for residents hardest hit by the pandemic or who face the\n greatest barriers to employment\n2. **Connect residents to jobs** and economic opportunities, including through\n workforce development, child care, transportation, or broadband\n3. **Reinvest in disinvested communities** and address long-standing\n disparities in access to education, capital, economic opportunities, and\n climate resilience\n4. **Stabilize housing and expand affordable housing** options for low-income\n households and housing-insecure renters\n5. Create opportunities for low-wealth households to **build wealth**.\n\nAcross all allocations for the city and county, **65%** of the funding has\nbeen allocated towards these strategies that promote inclusive recovery and\nequitable growth. The figure below shows the total amount of funding for\nRochester and Monroe County that was allocated to programs that align with these\nbuilding blocks, based on review of the program description and goals.\n\n\n::: {.cell}\n::: {.cell-output-display}\n![](index_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-4-1.png){width=672}\n:::\n:::\n\n\n## What types of inclusive recovery strategies are supported?\n\nOut of the funds allocated to programs that align with the five building blocks\nof an inclusive recovery, the most funding has been allocated to reinvesting in\ndisinvested communities, while the least has been allocated to creating jobs for\nresidents hardest hit by the pandemic or who face the greatest barriers to\nemployment. The figure below shows how that funding is divided among the five\nbuilding blocks and includes only the funds allocated to programs that align\nwith the building blocks.\n\n\n::: {.cell}\n::: {.cell-output-display}\n![Source: Urban Institute calculations of data from City of Rochester ARPA Reporting Dashboard and Monroe County Recovery Plan 2023 Annual Report](index_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-5-1.png){width=672}\n:::\n:::\n\n\n## What policy areas are being funded?\n\n\n::: {.cell}\n\n:::\n\n::: {.cell}\n \n \nThe City of Rochester and Monroe County have allocated almost **$301M** of SLFRF funds, and, of those, **14.6%** have been reported as spent. The figure below shows how that funding has been allocated across policy categories and includes all allocations, not just those that align with the building blocks of an inclusive recovery. \n \nBy category, most of the funds have been allocated to Community and Economic Development, Infrastructure, and Housing, while the least have been allocated to Operations, Public Health and COVID-19 Response, and Social Services. \n:::\n\n\n::: panel-tabset\n## Allocated\n\n\n::: {.cell}\n::: {.cell-output-display}\n![Source: Urban Institute calculations of data from City of Rochester ARPA Reporting Dashboard and Monroe County Recovery Plan 2023 Annual Report](index_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-8-1.png){width=672}\n:::\n:::\n\n\n## Spent\n\n\n::: {.cell}\n::: {.cell-output-display}\n![Source: Urban Institute calculations of data from City of Rochester ARPA Reporting Dashboard and Monroe County Recovery Plan 2023 Annual Report](index_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-9-1.png){width=672}\n:::\n:::\n\n:::\n\n## What subtopics are funded within each policy area?\n\nThe figure below provides a more detailed breakdown of allocations to each\npolicy area. Each policy area tab breaks down the allocations into subtopics.\nFor example, most of the money allocated to community and economic development\nhas gone to workforce development.\n\n::: panel-tabset\n### Community and Economic Development\n\n\n::: {.cell}\n::: {.cell-output-display}\n![Source: Urban Institute calculations of data from City of Rochester ARPA Reporting Dashboard and Monroe County Recovery Plan 2023 Annual Report](index_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-10-1.png){width=672}\n:::\n:::\n\n\n### Infrastructure\n\n\n::: {.cell}\n::: {.cell-output-display}\n![Source: Urban Institute calculations of data from City of Rochester ARPA Reporting Dashboard and Monroe County Recovery Plan 2023 Annual Report](index_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-11-1.png){width=672}\n:::\n:::\n\n\n### Housing\n\n\n::: {.cell}\n::: {.cell-output-display}\n![Source: Urban Institute calculations of data from City of Rochester ARPA Reporting Dashboard and Monroe County Recovery Plan 2023 Annual Report](index_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-12-1.png){width=672}\n:::\n:::\n\n\n### Public Safety\n\n\n::: {.cell}\n::: {.cell-output-display}\n![Source: Urban Institute calculations of data from City of Rochester ARPA Reporting Dashboard and Monroe County Recovery Plan 2023 Annual Report](index_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-13-1.png){width=672}\n:::\n:::\n\n\n### Social Services\n\n\n::: {.cell}\n::: {.cell-output-display}\n![Source: Urban Institute calculations of data from City of Rochester ARPA Reporting Dashboard and Monroe County Recovery Plan 2023 Annual Report](index_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-14-1.png){width=672}\n:::\n:::\n\n\n### Public Health\n\n\n::: {.cell}\n::: {.cell-output-display}\n![Source: Urban Institute calculations of data from City of Rochester ARPA Reporting Dashboard and Monroe County Recovery Plan 2023 Annual Report](index_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-15-1.png){width=672}\n:::\n:::\n\n\n### Operations\n\n\n::: {.cell}\n::: {.cell-output-display}\n![Source: Urban Institute calculations of data from City of Rochester ARPA Reporting Dashboard and Monroe County Recovery Plan 2023 Annual Report](index_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-16-1.png){width=672}\n:::\n:::\n\n:::\n\n## How does funding align with the Rochester Area Community Foundation's priorities?\n\n\n::: {.cell}\n\n:::\n\n\nThe Rochester Area Community Foundation's key priorities for investment in the\nregion include:\n\n- Closing the academic achievement and opportunity gap;\n\n- Fostering racial and ethnic understanding and equity;\n\n- Partnering against poverty;\n\n- Supporting arts and culture; Preserving historic assets;\n\n- Advancing environmental justice and sustainability; and\n\n- Promoting successful aging.\n\n\n::: {.cell}\n\nOverall, **61.1%** of SLFRF funding has been allocated towards these priority areas. The figure below shows how SLFRF funding is divided among the priority topics and includes only the funds allocated to programs that align with one of RACF's priority areas.\n:::\n\n::: {.cell}\n::: {.cell-output-display}\n![Source: Urban Institute calculations of data from City of Rochester ARPA Reporting Dashboard and Monroe County Recovery Plan 2023 Annual Report](index_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-18-1.png){width=672}\n:::\n:::\n\n\n## Which neighborhoods are the funds being spent in?\n\nThe map below shows how the City of Rochester's SLFRF capital investments map\nonto racial characteristics of neighborhoods, as well as the original Federal\nredlining maps for the city. Click on the tabs at the top to see how they\noverlap with the percent of residents who are Black in a neighborhood and the\npercent of residents who are Hispanic/Latino[^1].\n\n[^1]: We use the term \"Hispanic/Latino\" in this map because this is the term\n used in the data collected by the American Community Survey. We recognize\n that this may not be the preferred identifier for all, and we remain\n committed to employing inclusive language whenever possible. \n\n[Redlining](https://www.npr.org/2017/05/03/526655831/a-forgotten-history-of-how-the-u-s-government-segregated-america)\nrefers to the system that the Federal Housing Administration and the Home\nOwners' Loan Corporation used to grade the profitability of neighborhoods in the\nlate 1930s. The four categories were green (\"best\"), blue (\"still desirable\"),\nyellow (\"definitely declining\"), and red (\"hazardous\"). These grades were\nlargely based on the neighborhood's racial, ethnic, socioeconomic, and religious\ncomposition. Generally, White, middle-class neighborhoods received FHA home\nloans, whereas many Black and Hispanic/Latino neighborhoods were deemed\nhazardous and declining in value and did not receive FHA insured mortgages or\nloans. These maps [had long lasting\neffects](https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/200568/1/1010730592.pdf) on\nracial segregation, homeownership, and house values in redlined neighborhoods.\n\nTo increase equity in the region, leaders must overinvest in communities that\nhave been underinvested in historically. These investments must be those that\n[benefit incumbent\nresidents](https://www.urban.org/research/publication/what-policies-and-programs-can-support-inclusive-recovery-rochester-new-york),\nmeaning that they should not be investments that only benefit new, incoming\nwealthier residents, or those that have negative impacts on immediate neighbors,\nlike a sewage treatment facility or a highway that pollutes the air. And, they\nmust be investments that [community members\nwant](https://www.urban.org/research/publication/aligning-use-recovery-funds-community-goals-rochester-new-york),\nparticularly historically excluded members. The maps below give us a first\napproximation of how equitably investments are distributed, but further\nexploration of how these investments align with the goals of community members\nand how much they benefit historically excluded residents is necessary to ensure\nthat they are increasing equity within those communities. \n\n::: panel-tabset\n\n::: {.cell}\n\n:::\n\n::: {.cell}\n\n:::\n\n::: {.cell}\n\n:::\n\n\n\n### Redlining\n\n\n::: {.cell}\n::: {.cell-output-display}\n```{=html}\n
\n\n```\n:::\n:::\n\n::: {.cell}\n\n:::\n\n\n### Percent Black\n\n\n::: {.cell}\n::: {.cell-output-display}\n```{=html}\n
\n\n```\n:::\n:::\n\n\n### Percent Hispanic/Latino\n\n\n\n::: {.cell}\n::: {.cell-output-display}\n```{=html}\n
\n\n```\n:::\n:::\n\n:::\n\n
\n\n## Explore All Programs Funded {#programs-table}\n\nThis table shows all programs that the City of Rochester and Monroe County have\nallocated SLFRF funds to, as well as their building block, policy area, policy\nsubtopic, and RACF priority area category. The default display on the table\nshows the programs in order from largest to smallest allocation. You can use the\narrows next to each column title to sort the table by that column, and you can\nuse the search bars under each column or the overall search bar to search the\ntable. \n\nNote: Data on spending were only available from the City of Rochester \n\nData current as of: 08/22/23\n\n\n::: {.cell}\n::: {.cell-output-display}\n```{=html}\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n```\n:::\n:::\n\n\n
\n\n## About the Dashboard\n\nThis dashboard was created by the [Urban Institute](https://www.urban.org/) in\npartnership with and support from [The Rochester Area Community Foundation\n(RACF)](https://www.racf.org/) to visualize Monroe County and the City of\nRochester's ARPA spending by the five building blocks of inclusive recovery,\npolicy category, and RACF's investment priorities. By tracking recovery funding\nexpenditures, this dashboard allows us to monitor public spending by the\ncategories most critical in supporting an inclusive recovery from the COVID-19\npandemic.\n\n\n::: {.cell}\n::: {.cell-output-display}\n```{=html}\n\n\n\n```\n:::\n:::\n\n\n
\n\nFor more information about the dashboard, please contact [Meg\nNorris](mailto:mnorris@racf.org) (The Rochester Area community Foundation) or\n[Christina Stacy](mailto:cstacy@urban.org) (Urban Institute).\n\nClick For [Glossary of Terms](glossary.qmd)\n\nThe code used to create this dashboard was writen by [Manuel Alcalá\nKovalski](mailto:malcalakovalski@urban.org) and can be found on\n[GitHub](https://github.com/UI-Research/rochester-dashboard).\n", "supporting": [ "index_files" ], diff --git a/_freeze/site_libs/Redlininggrade-0.0.1/Redlininggrade_layer.fgb b/_freeze/site_libs/Redlininggrade-0.0.1/Redlininggrade_layer.fgb index ac9692da61a77c05a9a98748bc3d50fc3e15427d..d40a551ec0c3b71d7f67441f4b0ab26ae8af46cd 100644 GIT binary patch delta 30 lcmca`nB&4>jtQmQsir2T1|}v+7KVw94Xq7~TN{`H6aluP3cUaT delta 30 lcmca`nB&4>jtQmQ7Kv$wMyBRz$(Cu24Xq7~TN{`H6al>~3oHNt