-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 168
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Poor performance using dpm-solver #134
Comments
hello,I met the same question as you,have you solved it? |
Yep, maybe there are some flaws in the implementation of DPM-solver in MedSegDiff. I used the official version and then solved it. It is worth noting that the official version takes the epsilon as the input, not the mean and covariance, which are the direct output of the neural network. |
I just found that the latest DPM-Solver-V3 have included a demo with openai/guided-diffusion. The link is https://github.com/thu-ml/DPM-Solver-v3 which could help you. |
@RoboticsZhang Hello, how to use the official dpm-solver code? How did you modify dpm-solver to make the code run successfully? Is it convenient to publish your modified code? Or can I add you on WeChat? Looking forward to your reply, thank you very much! |
Thank you very much for your help. Have you considered sharing your solution? Or would you like to contact via email? |
++++兄弟,不会改dpm_solver.py,gaussian_diffusion.py这俩文件呀,你能把这俩文件放你的仓库里吗,疯狂星期四我V你50!!! |
|
|
After trainning for 17W steps, I can get good results without using dpm-solver in 1000 steps, as shown below:
However, when using dpm-solver in 20, 50, or 1000 steps, the results all look like the image below:
I wonder why dpm-solver generate so weird results.
Looking forward to your reply, thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: