You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I know you are concerned about flag bots in the wrong hands. I agree a flag bot has potential to do much damage but I would rather see a flag/spam bot for everyone instead of encourage people to delegate SP to "popular" spam fighters.
I imagine a good use case for now would be to set the algorithm to flag:
Blacklisted accounts that are repeating the same or almost identical comment in high volume.
The typical. "I upvoted you. Follow me please" for example, is something I would set I bot to flag If the account has posted this comment more then maybe 5 times that day.
I think we should be very careful we don't misconfigure our bots and let them run wild unattended, but I do think this would be a good approach to decentralizing spam control even further.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Content checking for either self similarity, blacklisted words or phrases, or similar
Point 2 needs to be developed.
Unless you can develop this example or come up with an alternative example that uses the existing metrics, I do not support adding flagging because I am not convinced it will be useful.
I know you are concerned about flag bots in the wrong hands. I agree a flag bot has potential to do much damage but I would rather see a flag/spam bot for everyone instead of encourage people to delegate SP to "popular" spam fighters.
I imagine a good use case for now would be to set the algorithm to flag:
Blacklisted accounts that are repeating the same or almost identical comment in high volume.
The typical. "I upvoted you. Follow me please" for example, is something I would set I bot to flag If the account has posted this comment more then maybe 5 times that day.
I think we should be very careful we don't misconfigure our bots and let them run wild unattended, but I do think this would be a good approach to decentralizing spam control even further.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: