You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thanks for making this tool available. When I processed the Hardi_150 example following your instructions, the denoised image has a spatial resolution of 1x1x1 mm^3. However, the input image voxel size is 2x2x2 mm^3. The volume dimensions are the same in both input and output 81x106x76.
Any ideas what could be causing this?
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi, thanks for your interest in our work! We don't particularly adjust the volumetric resolution and did not give special attention to their actual physical resolution. I guess with same volumetric dimensions, it is possible to store the volume with re-sampling or other proper configurations to align the resolutions.
Hello,
Thanks for making this tool available. When I processed the Hardi_150 example following your instructions, the denoised image has a spatial resolution of 1x1x1 mm^3. However, the input image voxel size is 2x2x2 mm^3. The volume dimensions are the same in both input and output 81x106x76.
Any ideas what could be causing this?
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: