Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix error: RedisClient::ReadTimeoutError (GEMFILE-DIRECTORY-11) #22

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

revise-dev[bot]
Copy link

@revise-dev revise-dev bot commented Oct 4, 2024

The error RedisClient::ReadTimeoutError: Waited 1.0 seconds is occurring due to a conflict between Sentry's Redis instrumentation and Sidekiq's Redis client. To resolve this, we need to disable Sentry's Redis instrumentation specifically.

The change involves adding a single line to the Sentry configuration in the config/initializers/sentry.rb file. This line tells Sentry to skip instrumenting Redis operations:

config.rails.skippable_instrumentations += %w[redis]

By adding Redis to the list of skippable instrumentations, we prevent Sentry from wrapping Redis operations with its own instrumentation code. This allows Sidekiq to interact with Redis directly, avoiding the timeout issue.

The original intent of the Sentry configuration was to set up error tracking and performance monitoring for the application. By default, Sentry instruments various parts of a Rails application, including Redis operations, to provide comprehensive monitoring. However, in this case, the Redis instrumentation is causing conflicts with Sidekiq's own Redis client usage.

This change maintains the overall functionality of Sentry for error tracking and performance monitoring while specifically excluding Redis operations from its instrumentation. This should resolve the timeout error without compromising the overall monitoring capabilities of Sentry for the rest of the application.

Tip

You can make revisions or ask questions of Revise.dev by using /revise in any comment or review!

  • /revise Add a comment above the method to explain why we're making this change.
  • /revise Why did you choose to make this change specifically?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants