You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The XML documentation of the generated types - at least the types which are directly used by developers - should match the documentation which is available on learn.microsoft.com and in the IDE when the "native" types are used.
I haven't checked all types, but I've found differences in:
CallerArgumentExpressionAttribute
class summary
class remarks
ctor paramter
property summary
Index
class summary
class remarks
various small differences in members
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
For my use, I don't really care if the docs match the types. I have XML doc generation enabled in my libs, and I get warnings on any public code that doesn't have XML comments. I'd be happy with anything, even empty, but I agree that it should be whatever MS has.
Rationale
The XML documentation of the generated types - at least the types which are directly used by developers - should match the documentation which is available on learn.microsoft.com and in the IDE when the "native" types are used.
I haven't checked all types, but I've found differences in:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: