tests: add feature presence automation

[ikerexxe]

The test case can be further extended to cover other features by using the parametrization that is already in place.

[jakub-vavra-cz]

Hi, this looks pretty good but there are some failures in the tests so we need to double check if the features should (not) be present.

[ikerexxe]

Hi, this looks pretty good but there are some failures in the tests so we need to double check if the features should (not) be present.

I checked it with Alexey and the spec file to make sure everything is right. This is ready for review again.

[jakub-vavra-cz]

LGTM

[jakub-vavra-cz]

@ikerexxe I wonder if we want more parts something for 2.9.5-4.el9_5.2 etc. as some feature like exop_force might land in different versions across different rhel versions.

[ikerexxe]

@ikerexxe I wonder if we want more parts something for 2.9.5-4.el9_5.2 etc. as some feature like exop_force might land in different versions across different rhel versions.

That's what RHEL major and minor versions are for. Or do you mean some other thing?

[danlavu]

I think this is good for a quick assertion to ensure the feature is present or not. I did like @jakub-vavra-cz idea to associate the condition in the test, so it will skip or run, not just feature checking. Maybe we can return to that topic next year.

So just the minor nitpick comments, thank you Iker.

[ikerexxe]

@danlavu @jakub-vavra-cz I would like to have this merged before the vacation period, so please do a final review. We can always expand the test case in the future to include additional information as needed.

[danlavu]

LG2M