We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hi colleagues,
we found this feature: https://sap.github.io/cf-service-operator/docs/usage/servicebinding/ and thought about a rotation. Each of our CF services (e.g. AuditLog) do have a servicebinding (secret key) in place which need to be rotated as they expire or because of security perspective. Looking at the BTP operator something similar would be great for Cloud Foundry: https://github.com/SAP/sap-btp-service-operator?tab=readme-ov-file#example
apiVersion: services.cloud.sap.com/v1 kind: ServiceBinding metadata: name: sample-binding spec: serviceInstanceName: sample-instance credentialsRotationPolicy: enabled: true rotatedBindingTTL: 48h rotationFrequency: 600h
I've talked to Christoph Barbian and he mentioned to do this in SPEC instead of using annotations.
Thank you and best regards Tobias
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Hi colleagues,
we found this feature: https://sap.github.io/cf-service-operator/docs/usage/servicebinding/ and thought about a rotation.
Each of our CF services (e.g. AuditLog) do have a servicebinding (secret key) in place which need to be rotated as they expire or because of security perspective.
Looking at the BTP operator something similar would be great for Cloud Foundry: https://github.com/SAP/sap-btp-service-operator?tab=readme-ov-file#example
apiVersion: services.cloud.sap.com/v1 kind: ServiceBinding metadata: name: sample-binding spec: serviceInstanceName: sample-instance credentialsRotationPolicy: enabled: true rotatedBindingTTL: 48h rotationFrequency: 600h
I've talked to Christoph Barbian and he mentioned to do this in SPEC instead of using annotations.
Thank you and best regards
Tobias
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: