-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 133
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Missing formats #1
Comments
#3 will also require a PKCS#7 implementation so I'll start work on that as well. I've created PKCS#7 support #28 to track. |
Do you want to stick to the big ones or are you also interested in things like the "TLS codec". It's not really a standard but it's being used quite a bit by now. I have a version here https://github.com/openmls/tls-codec/ |
@franziskuskiefer if you so happen to be looking for another home for it I'd say that would be a great thing to have here |
The new |
@jonasbb yes, it would be good to add support for those. Likewise it would be nice to have support for OpenSSH certificates. I will try to get these items added to the TODO list in the README, or otherwise would merge a PR to add them. |
The naming of the `to_owned` method was a bit unfortunate as it triggered conflicts with the `alloc::borrow::ToOwned` method. When used, this would make for compiler messages asking things like: ``` error[E0034]: multiple applicable items in scope --> certval/src/validator/name_constraints_set.rs:748:34 | 748 | value: a.to_owned(), | ^^^^^^^^ multiple `to_owned` found | = note: candidate RustCrypto#1 is defined in an impl of the trait `RefToOwned` for the type `AnyRef<'a>` = note: candidate RustCrypto#2 is defined in an impl of the trait `ToOwned` for the type `T` help: disambiguate the associated function for candidate RustCrypto#1 | 748 | value: RefToOwned::to_owned(&a), | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ help: disambiguate the associated function for candidate RustCrypto#2 | 748 | value: ToOwned::to_owned(&a), | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ```
The naming of the `to_owned` method was a bit unfortunate as it triggered conflicts with the `alloc::borrow::ToOwned` method. When used, this would make for compiler messages asking things like: ``` error[E0034]: multiple applicable items in scope --> certval/src/validator/name_constraints_set.rs:748:34 | 748 | value: a.to_owned(), | ^^^^^^^^ multiple `to_owned` found | = note: candidate #1 is defined in an impl of the trait `RefToOwned` for the type `AnyRef<'a>` = note: candidate #2 is defined in an impl of the trait `ToOwned` for the type `T` help: disambiguate the associated function for candidate #1 | 748 | value: RefToOwned::to_owned(&a), | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ help: disambiguate the associated function for candidate #2 | 748 | value: ToOwned::to_owned(&a), | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ```
Do you think RFC3161 TimeStamp Protocol would be a good addition to the formats? reference: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3161 |
I think RFC3161 would be a good addition and have thought about implementing it before but had not gotten around to it. It's referenced in some new work, for example, draft-birkholz-rats-epoch-markers. |
I'd like to help, can I just open a PR once I've got some basic implementation of the structures? Maybe a new folder under formats/tsp? |
We'd need a crate name we actually control, although you can use that name temporarily until we pick one we do control |
I would potentially be interested in contributing an implementation of RFC5544. Is that something the project would benefit from? |
Hey @leotaku I've actually created an issue for this format and I have most of the work done locally, the blocking issue for me is that I get an indefinite length error which seems to come from a BER/DER mixed encoding. #1198 I was waiting to get some feedback, but I could definitely open a PR for you to test for your self, maybe you can spot something i missed. |
@enri1196 That sounds great. If you open a PR or direct me to your fork I'd love to take a look. |
PKCS#15 |
cms: use aes-kw pre-release
Please post a comment to request additional formats
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: